Choosing a Methodological Path: Reflections on the Constructivist Turn



Breckenridge, Jenna and Jones, Derek and Elliott, Ian and Nicol, Maggie (2012) Choosing a Methodological Path: Reflections on the Constructivist Turn. The Grounded Theory Review, 11 (1).

[img]
Preview
PDF
ChoosingaMethodologicalPathVol111.pdf

Download (31kB)

Abstract

Researchers deciding to use grounded theory are faced with complex decisions regarding which method or version of grounded theory to use: Classic, straussian, feminist or constructivist grounded theory. Particularly for beginning PhD researchers, this can prove challenging given the complexities of the inherent philosophical debates and the ambiguous and conflicting use of grounded theory ‘versions’ within popular literature. The aim of this article is to demystify the differences between classic and constructivist grounded theory, presenting a critique of constructivist grounded theory that is rooted in the learning experiences of the first author as she grappled with differing perspectives during her own PhD research.

Item Type: Article
Divisions: School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management > Business, Enterprise & Management
School of Health Sciences > Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies
Date Deposited: 27 Jun 2012 10:02
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2014 13:00
URI: http://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/2840

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item