dc.contributor.author | Durward, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Baer, Gill | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T21:45:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T21:45:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995-08 | |
dc.identifier | ER1021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Durward, B. & Baer, G. (1995) Physiotherapy and Neurology: Towards Research-based Practice, Physiotherapy, vol. 81, , pp. 436-439, | |
dc.identifier.issn | 319406 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66719-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/1021 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the current practices of physiotherapists working in neurology and argues that a techniques versus science imbalance makes it necessary to develop a scientific knowledge base within physiotherapy practice. Scepticism, determinism and empiricism are identified as three major elements underpinning a scientific approach. Each element is defined, elaborated upon and pragmatic recommendations offered in order to facilitate the implementation of these elements in physiotherapy practice. | |
dc.format.extent | 436-439 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Physiotherapy | |
dc.subject | Knowledge base | |
dc.subject | scepticism | |
dc.subject | determinism | |
dc.subject | empiricism | |
dc.title | Physiotherapy and Neurology: Towards Research-based Practice | |
dc.type | article | |
dcterms.accessRights | restricted | |
dc.description.faculty | sch_phy | |
dc.description.volume | 81 | |
dc.identifier.doi | http://doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66719-3 | |
dc.description.ispublished | pub | |
dc.description.eprintid | 1021 | |
rioxxterms.type | article | |
qmu.author | Baer, Gill | |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.description.number | 8 | |