Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License
dc.contributor.authorParker, Melissaen
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Timen
dc.contributor.authorPearson, Georginaen
dc.contributor.authorPeach, Nicholaen
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Rachelen
dc.contributor.authorRees, Nicholasen
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-10T14:57:13Z
dc.date.available2020-01-10T14:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-13
dc.identifier.citationParker, M., Allen, T., Pearson, G., Peach, N., Flynn, R. & Rees, N. (2012) Border parasites: Schistosomiasis control among Uganda’s fisherfolk. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 6(1), pp. 98-123.en
dc.identifier.issn1753-1055en
dc.identifier.issn1753-1063
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10375
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2012.664706
dc.descriptionGeorgina Pearson – ORCID 0000-0002-7252-7835 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-7835en
dc.description.abstractIt is recognized that the control of schistosomisais in Uganda requires a focus on fisherfolk. Large numbers suffer from this water-borne parasitic disease; notably along the shores of lakes Albert and Victoria and along the River Nile. Since 2004, a policy has been adopted of providing drugs, free of charge, to all those at risk. The strategy has been reported to be successful, but closer investigation reveals serious problems. This paper draws upon long-term research undertaken at three locations in northwestern and southeastern Uganda. It highlights consequences of not engaging with the day to day realities of fisherfolk livelihoods; attributable, in part, to the fact that so many fisherfolk live and work in places located at the country’s international borders, and to a related tendency to treat them as ‘‘feckless’’ and ‘‘ungovernable’’. Endeavours to roll out treatment end up being haphazard, erratic and location-specific. In some places, concerted efforts have been made to treat fisherfolk; but there is no effective monitoring, and it is difficult to gauge what proportion have actually swallowed the tablets. In other places, fisherfolk are, in practice, largely ignored, or are actively harassed in ways that make treatment almost impossible. At all sites, the current reliance upon resident ‘‘community’’ drug distributors or staff based at static clinics and schools was found to be flawed.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2012.664706en
dc.format.extent98-123en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Eastern African Studiesen
dc.rights© 2012 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectUgandaen
dc.subjectFisherfolken
dc.subjectFishermenen
dc.subjectNeglected Tropical Diseasesen
dc.subjectSchistosomiasisen
dc.subjectDisease Controlen
dc.titleBorder parasites: Schistosomiasis control among Uganda’s fisherfolken
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.volume6en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2012-04-13
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-10
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOAen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
qmu.authorPearson, Georginaen
qmu.centreInstitute for Global Health and Developmenten
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number1en
refterms.versionVoRen
refterms.dateDeposit2020-01-10


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License