Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Jamal K.en
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T10:41:57Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T10:41:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-19
dc.identifier.citationMansour, J. K. (2020) The confidence-accuracy relationship using scale versus other methods of assessing confidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), pp. 215-230.en
dc.identifier.issn2211-3681en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10422
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.01.003
dc.description.abstractHistorically, researchers have collected eyewitness identification confidence using scales; however, in practice, eyewitnesses are more commonly asked for a verbal statement. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a simultaneous lineup and provided confidence in their own words, by explaining why they made their decision, or by selecting from statements made by real eyewitnesses, and then provided a scale rating (0-100%) or provided only the scale rating. In Experiment 2, participants viewed a sequential lineup and provided confidence in their own words followed by the scale rating or only the scale rating. Confidence predicted identification accuracy in all conditions, although verbal statements were highly variable and challenging to interpret. For example, only when scale-based confidence was high (80%+) did interpretation of the verbal confidence statement reliably align with scale-based confidence. These data highlight the complexity of verbal confidence statements and the need to establish meaningful boundaries for interpreting verbal confidence statements.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.01.003en
dc.format.extent215-231
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognitionen
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectConfidenceen
dc.subjectEyewitness Identificationen
dc.subjectCACen
dc.subjectCalibrationen
dc.titleThe confidence-accuracy relationship using scale versus other methods of assessing confidenceen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-14
dc.description.volume9
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2020-03-19
refterms.dateEmbargoEnd2021-03-19
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-16
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
qmu.authorMansour, Jamal K.en
qmu.centreCentre for Applied Social Sciencesen
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number2
refterms.versionAMen
refterms.dateDeposit2020-01-16
refterms.dateFreeToRead2021-03-19
refterms.dateFreeToDownload2021-03-19
refterms.dateToSearch2021-03-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license