|dc.identifier.citation||Wyse, J., Mercer, T. & Gleeson, N. (1994) Time-of-day dependence of isokinetic leg strength and associated interday variability., British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, , pp. 167-170,||
|dc.description.abstract||The purpose of this study was to assess the interday variability and time-of-day effects on selected isokinetic leg strength indices. Nine adult collegiate sportsmen (mean(s.e.) age 19.6(0.5) years; mean(s.e.) height 1.81(0.02) m; mean(s.e.) body mass 76.5(3.1) kg) completed a series of nine test sessions, organized so that each subject was tested three times within a day (08.00-09.00 hours; 13.00-14.00 hours; 18.00-19.30 hours), on three occasions, each separated by a minimum of 7 days. Gravity-corrected indices of extension peak torque (EPT), flexion peak torque (FPT), and the peak torque ratio (PTR), at contraction velocities of 1.05 rad s-1 and 3.14 rad s-1, were calculated for each subject using an isokinetic dynamometer. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance of coefficient of variation (V%) scores revealed no significant differences in performance variability across within-subject factors of time-of-day and performance index (P > 0.05). Overall mean(s.e.) V% for scores across experimental conditions were 3.97(0.72)% at 1.05 rad s-1 and 5.98(1.23)% at 3.14 rad s-1, suggesting that similar levels of measurement error occur between 08.00-19.30 hours. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance of absolute strength indices (EPT, FPT and PTR) revealed that significantly higher scores were achieved during session 3 (18.00-19.30 hours), with mean(s.e.) values of 249.1(40.0) N m, 149.0(32.3) N m, 59.5(5.0)% at 1.05 rad s-1, and 172.1(38.7) N m, 121.3(27.7) N m, 71.1(6.2)% at 3.14 rad s-1, respectively (P < 0.05). This finding appears to be consistent with current knowledge about time-of-day effects on the assessment of muscular strength. Thus for stable and maximal values to be obtained during isokinetic leg testing, the use of multiple-trial protocols is recommended, with testing occurring as close to 18.00-19.30 hours as possible. In addition, the observed significant time-of-day effect suggests that appropriate comparison of maximal isokinetic leg strength can only be achieved based on data obtained within 30 min of the same time of day.||
|dc.relation.ispartof||British Journal of Sports Medicine||
|dc.subject||Isokinetic Leg Strength||
|dc.title||Time-of-day dependence of isokinetic leg strength and associated interday variability.||
|dc.description.referencetext||1 Wyatt MP, Edwards AM. Comparisons of quadriceps and
hamstrings torque values during isokinetic exercise. Journal of
Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1981; 3: 48-56.
2 Morris A, Lussier L, Dooley G, Bell J. Hamstring/quadriceps
ratios in middle distance and distance runners. Physician and
Sportsmedicine 1983; 11: 71-7.
3 Rankin JM, Thompson CB. Isokinetic evaluation of quadriceps
and hamstrings function: normative data concerning
body weight in sport. Athletic Training 1983; 18: 110-14.
4 Oberg B, Ekstrand J, Moller M, Gilquist J. Muscle strength
and flexibility in different positions of soccer players.
International Journal of Sports Medicine 1984; 5: 213-16.
5 Burnie J, Brodie DA. Isokinetic measurement in preadolescent
males. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 205-9.
6 Kannus P. Relationship between peak torque and total work
in an isokinetic contraction of the medial collateral ligament
insufficient knee. Int J Sports Med 1988; 9: 294-6.
7 Rochcongar P. Morvan R, Jan J, Dassonville J, Belloit J.
Isokinetic investigation of knee extensors and knee flexors in
young French soccer players. Int J Sports Med 1988; 9: 448-50.
8 Moore JR, Wade G. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament
injuries. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal
1989; 11: 35-40.
9 Read MTF, Bellamy MJ. Comparison of hamstring/quadricep
isokinetic strength ratios and power in tennis, squash and
track athletes. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24: 178-82.
10 Gleeson NP, Mercer TH. Intra-subject variability in isokinetic
knee extension and flexion strength characteristics of adult
males: a comparative examination of gravity-corrected and
-uncorrected data. I Sports Sci 1991; 9: 415-16.
11 Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity
relations and fibre composition in human knee extensor
muscles. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 12-16.
12 Johnson J, Siegel D. Reliability of an isokinetic movement of
the knee extensors. Res Q Exerc Sport 1978; 49: 88-90.
13 Gleeson NP, Mercer TH. Reproducibility of isokinetic leg
strength and endurance characteristics of adult men and
women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1992; 65: 221-8.
14 Armstrong LE. Desynchronisation of biological rhythms in
athletes: jet lag. National Strength and Conditioning Association
Journal 1988; 10: 68-70.
15 Reilly T. Circadian rhythms and exercise. In: MacLeod D,
Maughan R, Nimmo M, Reilly T, Williams C, eds. Exercise:
Benefits, Limits and Adaptations. London, UK: E. and F. N.
Spon, 1987: 346-64.
16 Winget CM, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms
and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17:
17 Baxter C. Reilly T. Influence of time of day on all-out
swimming. Br J Sports Med 1983; 17: 122-7.
18 Reilly T, Walsh TJ. Physiological, psychological and performance
measures during an endurance record for five-a-side
soccer. Br J Sports Med 1981; 15: 122-8.
19 Coldwells A, Atkinson G, Reilly T. The validity and reliability
of back and leg dynamometry. J Sports Sci 1991; 9: 334.
20 Nelson S. Duncan P. Correction of isokinetic torque
recordings for the effect of gravity. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 674-6.
21 Sokal R, Rohlf F. Biometry, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: W. H.
22 Winer BJ. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd ed.
New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
23 Baltzopoulos V, Brodie DA. Isokinetic dynamometry; applications
and limitations. Sports Med 1989; 8: 101-16.||