Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:45:55Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:45:55Z
dc.date.issued1992-05
dc.identifierER1049
dc.identifier.citationGleeson, N. & Mercer, T. (1992) Reproducibility of isokinetic leg strength and endurance characteristics of adult men and women, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, vol. 65, , pp. 221-228,
dc.identifier.issn0301-5548
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00705085
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/1049
dc.description.abstractDay-to-day variability and single-measurement reliability of selected isokinetic knee extension-flexion strength and endurance indices were assessed in 10 adult men and 8 adult women. On three occasions separated by at least 5 days, the subjects completed 4 reciprocal maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) at different angular velocities (1.05 rad s-1 and 3.14 rad s-1). The men also completed a muscular endurance test consisting of 30 reciprocal, MVC at 3.14 rad -1. Coefficient of variation, intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of single-measurement scores support the continued use of gravity corrected peak torque (PT) and average peak torque (APT) as indices of isokinetic leg strength. Similarly, gravity corrected APT and total work should be the recommended indices of isokinetic leg muscular endurance in men. The results suggest that these isokinetic indices must be assessed using multiple day-to-day trial protocols adequately to describe performance capacity. Composite indices such as the ratio of Knee flexion to extension PT and fatigue measurements offer considerably reduced reliability and a greater potential for misinterpretation. The reliability of knee extension indices generally exceeds that of flexion indices. Similar variability and reproducibility of responses were observed between men and women and between reciprocal contractions performed at angular velocities of 1.05 rad s-1 and 3.14 rad s-1.
dc.format.extent221-228
dc.publisherSpringer Berlin / Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
dc.subjectIsokinetic contractions
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectLeg muscle strength
dc.subjectEndurance
dc.subjectGender difference
dc.titleReproducibility of isokinetic leg strength and endurance characteristics of adult men and women
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dc.description.facultysch_phy
dc.description.volume65
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1007/BF00705085
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid1049
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorMercer, Tom
qmu.authorGleeson, Nigel
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number3


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record