Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Micheleen
dc.contributor.authorSingh-Roy, Anusuaen
dc.contributor.authorHultqvist, Jennyen
dc.contributor.authorPan, Ay-Woanen
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, Deborahen
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Nicolaen
dc.contributor.authorIrvine Fitzpatrick, Lindaen
dc.contributor.authorForsyth, Kirstyen
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-19T10:30:03Z
dc.date.available2020-05-19T10:30:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHarrison, M., Singh-Roy, A., Hultqvist, J., Pan, A. W., McCartney, D., McGuire, N., Irvine Fitzpatrick, L. & Forsyth, K. (2020) Quality of life outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (In Press).
dc.identifier.issn1433-9285en
dc.identifier.issn0933-7954
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01885-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10599
dc.descriptionMichele Harrison - ORCID 0000-0001-6088-2998 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-2998en
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in three types of supported accommodation.en
dc.description.abstractMethod: Studies were identified that described QoL outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation in 6 electronic databases. We applied a random-effects model to derive the meta-analytic results.
dc.description.abstractResults: 13 studies from 7 countries were included, with 3276 participants receiving; high support (457), supported housing (1576) and floating outreach (1243). QoL outcomes related to wellbeing, living conditions and social functioning were compared between different supported accommodation types. Living condition outcomes were better for people living in supported housing (𝑔 = -0.31; CI = [-0.47; -0.16]) and floating outreach (𝑔 = -0.95; CI = [-1.30; -0.61]) compared to high support accommodation, with a medium effect size for living condition outcomes between supported housing and floating outreach (𝑔 = -0.40; CI = [-0.82; 0.03]), indicating that living conditions are better for people living in floating outreach. Social functioning outcomes were significant for people living in supported housing compared to high support (𝑔 = -0.37; CI = [-0.65; -0.09]), with wellbeing outcomes not significant between the three types of supported accommodation.
dc.description.abstractConclusion: There is evidence that satisfaction with living conditions differs across supported accommodation types. The results suggest there is a need to focus on improving social functioning and wellbeing outcomes for people with serious mental illness across supported accommodation types.
dc.description.urihttps://www.springer.com/journal/127en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiologyen
dc.titleQuality of life outcomes for people with serious mental illness living in supported accommodation: Systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2020
refterms.dateFCD2020-05-19
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOAen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
qmu.authorHarrison, Micheleen
qmu.authorSingh-Roy, Anusuaen
qmu.authorForsyth, Kirstyen
qmu.authorMcCartney, Deborahen
qmu.centreCentre for Applied Social Sciencesen
refterms.versionAMen
refterms.dateDeposit2020-05-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record