Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Pérez de Villar, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Olmos, Francisco José
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Domínguez, Francisco de Borja
dc.contributor.authorBenavent-Caballer, Vicent
dc.contributor.authorMontañez-Aguilera, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Tom
dc.contributor.authorSegura-Ortí, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-02T07:57:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-02T07:57:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-19
dc.date.submitted2019-08-28
dc.identifierpubmed: 32427935
dc.identifierpmc: PMC7237690
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/10605/10605.pdf
dc.identifier.citationOrtega-Pérez de Villar, L., Martínez-Olmos, F. J., Pérez-Domínguez, F. d. B., Benavent-Caballer, V., Montañez-Aguilera, F. J., Mercer, T. & Segura-Ortí, E. (2020) Comparison of intradialytic versus home-based exercise programs on physical functioning, physical activity level, adherence, and health-related quality of life: Pilot study. Scientific Reports, 10:8302.
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10605
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64372-y
dc.descriptionFrom PubMed via Jisc Publications Router
dc.description.abstractIntradialytic exercise (ID) programs are effective and safe for hemodialysis (HD) patients to avoid functional deterioration. However, exercise is not routinely undertaken in most HD units, and we do not know if home-based (HB) programs are as effective as ID programs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 16 weeks of ID exercise versus a HB exercise program for HD patients. A total of 46 patients were randomly assigned to the ID group (n = 24) or HB group (n = 22). They completed a 16-week combined exercise program 3 times/week. We measured physical activity level, physical functioning, depression level, and health-related quality of life at baseline and after 16 weeks. A significant time effect was found in both groups for the physical activity level (p = 0.012). There was also a significant group-time interaction effect for the one-leg standing test (OLST) (p = 0.049) and a significant time effect for the Short Physical Performance Battery (p = 0.013), timed up-and-go test (p = 0.005), sit-to-stand-10 (p = 0.027), right and left hand handgrip (p = 0.044, p < 0.001), one-heel left leg raise (p = 0.019), and 6-minute walking (p = 0.006), depression (p = 0.017). HRQoL remained unchanged. There was no difference between the two interventions on the tested outcomes (besides OLST). Both interventions were associated with positive changes of the physical activity levels and physical function.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by a 2017–2018 research and teaching projects support grant from the CEU-UCH (grant code IDOC17/19).
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNature
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceeissn: 2045-2322
dc.subjectEnd-stage Renal Disease
dc.subjectQuality Of Life
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleComparison of intradialytic versus home-based exercise programs on physical functioning, physical activity level, adherence, and health-related quality of life: Pilot study
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-15
dc.date.updated2020-06-02T00:39:54Z
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.ispublishedpub
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-02
qmu.authorMercer, Tom
qmu.centreCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research
dc.description.statuspub
refterms.dateDeposit2020-06-02


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License