dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jungwon | en |
dc.contributor.author | Mansour, Jamal K. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Penrod, Steven D. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-17T09:22:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-17T09:22:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03-29 | |
dc.identifier | https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/11108/11108.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lee, J., Mansour, J. K. & Penrod, S. D. (2022) 'Validity of mock-witness measures for assessing lineup fairness', Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(3), pp. 215-245. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1068-316X | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1477-2744 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905811 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11108 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although eyewitness researchers have used mock-witness measures to assess aspects of lineup fairness, they have paid little attention to their validity. The current study tested predictive validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of mock-witness measures from a meta-analytic perspective. Overall, mock-witness measures had predictive validity, particularly in target-absent (TA) lineups—the lineup fairness estimated by the measures reliably predicted eyewitnesses’ choosing behaviors and discriminability of a suspect from fillers in TA lineups. However, correlations between lineup fairness estimated by mock-witnesses and eyewitness performance were significant in target-present (TP) lineups only when eyewitnesses had a moderate memory for the perpetrator. Multitrait-multimethod correlations demonstrated significant intradomain correlations between mock-witness measures and other lineup fairness indices and nonsignificant interdomain correlations between the mock-witness measures and indices reflecting memory strength for the perpetrator, which supported convergent validity and discriminant validity, respectively. The implications for research and practice are discussed. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Foundation Grant No. SES-1754079 | en |
dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905811 | en |
dc.format.extent | 215-245 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psychology, Crime & Law | en |
dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology, Crime, and Law on Mar 29, 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905811 | |
dc.subject | Mock-witness | en |
dc.subject | Mock-witness Paradigm | en |
dc.subject | Eyewitness | en |
dc.subject | Lineup Fairness | en |
dc.subject | Lineup Bias | en |
dc.title | Validity of mock-witness measures for assessing lineup fairness | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dcterms.accessRights | public | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-02-15 | |
dc.description.volume | 28 | |
dc.description.ispublished | pub | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en |
rioxxterms.publicationdate | 2021-03-29 | |
refterms.dateEmbargoEnd | 2022-03-29 | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-02-17 | |
refterms.depositException | NA | en |
refterms.accessException | NA | en |
refterms.technicalException | NA | en |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en |
qmu.author | Mansour, Jamal K. | en |
qmu.centre | Centre for Applied Social Sciences | en |
dc.description.status | pub | |
dc.description.number | 3 | |
refterms.version | AM | en |
refterms.dateDeposit | 2021-02-17 | |
refterms.dateFreeToRead | 2022-03-29 | |
refterms.dateFreeToDownload | 2022-03-29 | |
refterms.dateToSearch | 2022-03-29 | |