dc.description.abstract | This dissertation was designed to assess Singapore’s current and projected food security
based on the national response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and projected
impacts of the country’s emerging agrotechnology sector outlined by the Singapore
government’s “30 by 30” plan to increase food self-sufficiency from 10% to 30% by 2030.
However, when the qualitative data collection concluded with a substantial non-response error,
the dissertation shifted to a critical reflection on the research process and conducting research
during a pandemic. An exploratory case-study research design was utilised to determine the
extent of Singapore’s ability to fulfil the four pillars of food security – availability, accessibility,
utilisation, and stability – and evaluate the reasons for non-response and necessity to redesign
the method of inquiry. Results of this study demonstrated the value and potential of broadening
examinations of the research subject area as well as the research method. The findings may
offer researchers and academic advisors with a critically reviewed consolidation of data on
Singapore’s food security policies and strategies, along with guidance on pursuing similar
research projects that would mitigate the challenges of attempting data collection during a
global public health crisis. | en |