|dc.description.referencetext||ABITOL, MM., CASTILLO, I., TAYLOR, U.B., ROCHELSON, B.L., SCHMOYS, S, & MONHEIT, A.G. (1993). Vaginal birth after caesarean section: the patients' point of view. American Family Physician, 47, 129-134.
BEISECKER, A.E., & BEISECKER, T.D. (1990). Patient information-seeking behaviours when communicating with doctors. Medical Care, 28, 19-28.
CAHILL, A.G., STAMILIO, D.M., ODIBO, A.O., PEIPERT, J.F., RATCLIFF, S.J., STEVENS, E.J.,SAMMEL, M.D. & MACONES, G.A. (2006). Is vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat caesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195, 1143-47.
CEGALA, D.J. (1997). A study of doctors' and patients' communication during a primary care consultation: Implications for communication training. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 169-194.
CHARMAZ, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London. Sage.
EDWARDS, A. (2004). Flexible rather than standardised approaches to communicating risks in health care. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13, 169-17
EDWARDS, A., ELWYN, G., COVEY, J., MATTHEWS, E. & PILL, R. (2001). Presenting risk information: a review of the effects of framing- and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 61-82.
FENWICK, J., GAMBLE, J. & MAWSON, J. (2003). Women's experiences of Caesarean section and vaginal birth after caesarean: A birthrites initiative. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9 (1): 10-17.
FRASER, W., MAUNSELL, E., HODNETT, E., MOUTQUIN, J.-M. (1997). Randomized controlled trial of a prenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section education and support program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 176: 419-25.
GLASER, B.G. & STRAUSS, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York. Aldine.
HOREY, D., WEAVER, J. & RUSSELL, H. (2004). Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth. Cochrane database Systematic Review (1): CD003858.
INFORMATION CENTRE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE, (2006.) NHS maternity statistics, England 2004-5. London: Information Centre.
IRVINE, L. M., & SHAW, R. W. (2001). Trial of scar or elective repeat caesarean section at maternal request. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(5), 463-467.
ISD SCOTLAND (Information Services Division of the NHS in Scotland) (2006) National Statistics release. Available at http://www.isdscotland.org/births. Accessed on 25/10/07.
LAUER, J. A. & BETRAN, A.P. (2007). Decision aids for women with a previous caesarean section. British Medical Journal, 334, 1281-1282.
LLOYD, A. (2001). The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qualitative Health Care, 10 (Suppl I):il4-il8.
MACONES, G.A. & PEIPERT, J., NELSON, D. B., ODIBO, A., STEVENS, E.J., STAMILIO, D.M., PARE, E., ELOVITZ, M., SCISCIONE, A., SAMMEL, M.D., & RATCLIFFE, S.J. (2005). Maternal complications with vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a multicenter study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193, 1656-1662.
MCCLAIN, C.S. (1990). The making of a medical tradition: Vaginal birth after caesarean. Social Sciences and Medicine, 31, 2, 203-210.
MCCLAIN, C.S. (1985). Why women choose trial of labour or repeat cesarean section. The Journal of Family Practice, 21, 3, 210-216.
MEDDINGS, F., MACVANE PHIPPS, HAITH-COOPER, M. & HAIGH, J. (2006). Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women's perceptions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 160-167.
MONTGOMERY, A.A., EMMETT, C.L., FAHEY, T., JONES, C., RICKETTS, I.., PATEL, R.R., PETERS, T.J., & MURPHY, D.J. (2007). Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 334; 1305- doi: 10.1136/bmj.39217.671019.55
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (2004). Clinical Guideline 13: Caesarean Section. London: NICE.
NEUHAS, W., BAUERSCHMITZ, G., GOHING, U., & SCHMIDT, T. (2001). The risk of rupture of the uterus: An analysis of 1086 births after previous caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(3), 232-235.
ONG, L. M. L., DEHAES, J.C. J. M., HOOS, A. M. & LAMMES, F. B. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 903-918.
PALING, J. (2003). Strategies to help patients understand risks. British Medical Journal, 327,745-8.
RIDLEY, R.T., DAVIS, P.A., BRIGHT, J.H., & SINCLAIR, D. (2002). What influences a woman to choose vaginal birth after caesarean? Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 31 (6):665-72.
ROTER, D.L. & FRANKEL, R. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Social Science and Medicine, 34, 1097-1103.
SHORTEN, A., SHORTEN, B., KEOGH, J. WEST, S., MORRIS, J. (2005). Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after caesarean. Birth, 32, 252-261.
SINGH, T., JUSTIN, C.W., & HALOOB, R.K. (2004). An audit of trends of vaginal delivery after one previous caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 24(2), 135-138.
SMITH, J., & OSBORN, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Eds.), Qualitative psychology (pp. 51-80). London: Sage.
SMITH G.C., PELL J.P., PASUPATHY D. & DOBBIE, R. (2004). Factors predisposing to perinatal death related to uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after caesarean section: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 329: 375-7.
STAPLETON, H., KIRKHAM, M. & THOMAS, G. (2002). Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. British Medical Journal, 324, 639.
THOMAS, J. & PARANJOTHY, S. (2001). Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press.
WILLIG, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham. Open University Press.
ZIB, M., LIM, L. & WALTERS, W.A. (1999). Symptoms during normal pregnancy: a prospective controlled study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39(4), 401-10.