Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMousikou, Petroulaen
dc.contributor.authorStrycharczuk, Patrycjaen
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Aliceen
dc.contributor.authorScobbie, James M.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T14:46:39Z
dc.date.available2021-09-23T14:46:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-15
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/11496/11496.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMousikou, P., Strycharczuk, P., Turk, A. & Scobbie, J. M. (2021) Coarticulation across morpheme boundaries: An ultrasound study of past-tense inflection in Scottish English. Journal of Phonetics, 88:101101.en
dc.identifier.issn0095-4470en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101101
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11496
dc.descriptionJames M. Scobbie - ORCID: 0000-0003-4509-6782 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-6782en
dc.description.abstractIt has been hypothesized that morphologically-complex words are mentally stored in a decomposed form, often requiring online composition during processing. Morphologically-simple words can only be stored as a whole. The way a word is stored and retrieved is thought to influence its realization during speech production, so that when retrieval requires less time, the articulatory plan is executed faster. Faster articulatory execution could result in more coarticulation. Accordingly, we hypothesized that morphologically-simple words might be produced with more coarticulation than apparently homophonous morphologically-complex words, because the retrieval of monomorphemic forms is direct, in contrast to morphologically-complex ones, which might need to be composed online into full word forms. Using Ultrasound Tongue Imaging, we tested this hypothesis with nine speakers of Scottish English. Over two days of training, participants learned phonemically identical monomorphemic and morphologically-complex nonce words, while on the third consecutive testing day, they produced them in two prosodic contexts. Two types of articulatory analyses revealed no systematic differences in coarticulation between monomorphemic and morphologically-complex items, yet a few speakers did idiosyncratically produce some morphological effects on articulation. Our work contributes to our understanding of how morphologically complex words are stored and processed during speech production.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101101en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Phoneticsen
dc.subjectSpeech Productionen
dc.subjectMorphologyen
dc.subjectCoarticulationen
dc.subjectUltrasound Tongue Imagingen
dc.titleCoarticulation across morpheme boundaries: An ultrasound study of past-tense inflection in Scottish Englishen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-21
dc.description.volume88en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2021-09-15
refterms.dateEmbargoEnd2023-03-15
refterms.dateFCD2021-09-23
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
qmu.authorScobbie, James M.en
qmu.centreCASLen
dc.description.statuspub
refterms.versionAMen
refterms.dateDeposit2021-09-23
refterms.dateFreeToRead2023-03-15
refterms.dateFreeToDownload2023-03-15
refterms.dateToSearch2023-03-15


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record