Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.contributor.authorTeeling, Sean Paul
dc.contributor.authorDewing, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBaldie, Deborah
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T14:35:20Z
dc.date.available2022-03-09T14:35:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-18
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/11931/11931.pdf
dc.identifier.citationTeeling, S.P., Dewing, J. and Baldie, D. (2022) 'Developing new methods for person-centred approaches to adjudicate context−mechanism−outcome configurations in realist evaluation', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), article no. e2370.
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11931
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042370
dc.descriptionFrom MDPI via Jisc Publications Router
dc.description.abstractRealist evaluation provides a general method of evaluating the application of interventions including policy, legislation, projects, and new processes in social settings such as law enforcement, healthcare and education. Realist evaluation focuses on what about interventions works, for whom, and in what circumstances, and there is a growing body of work using realist evaluation to analyse interventions in healthcare organizations, including those using Lean Six Sigma improvement methodologies. Whilst realist evaluation facilitates the analysis of interventions using both qualitative and quantitative research, there is little guidance given on methods of data collection and analysis. The purpose of this study is to address this lack of guidance through detailing the use of innovative person-centred methods of data collection and analysis in a realist evaluation that enabled us to understand the contribution of Lean Six Sigma to person-centred care and cultures. This use of person-centred principles in the adjudication of identified program theories has informed novel methods of collecting and analysing data in realist evaluation that facilitate a person-centred approach to working with research participants and a way of making the implicit explicit when adjudicating program theory.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectRealist Evaluation
dc.subjectCreative Methods
dc.subjectPerson Centred
dc.subjectPerson-centred Cultures
dc.subjectData Collection
dc.subjectLean Six Sigma
dc.titleDeveloping new methods for person-centred approaches to adjudicate context−mechanism−outcome configurations in realist evaluation
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-15
dc.date.updated2022-02-20T03:30:07Z
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.publicationdate2022-02-18
refterms.dateFCD2022-03-09
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
qmu.authorTeeling, Sean Paul
qmu.authorDewing, Jan
qmu.authorBaldie, Deborah
qmu.centreCentre for Person-centred Practise Research
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number4
refterms.versionVoR
refterms.dateDeposit2022-03-09


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License