Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.contributor.authorMarsico, Petra
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Tom
dc.contributor.authorvan Hedel, Hubertus J A
dc.contributor.authorvan der Linden, Marietta
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T09:31:21Z
dc.date.available2022-09-01T09:31:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-29
dc.identifierpubmed: 35906774
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2102257
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12559/12559.pdf
dc.identifier.citationMarsico, P., Mercer, T.H., van Hedel, H.J.A. and van der Linden, M.L. (2022) ‘What are the relevant categories, modalities, and outcome measures for assessing lower limb somatosensory function in children with upper motor neuron lesions? A Delphi study’, Disability and Rehabilitation, pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2102257.
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12559
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2102257
dc.descriptionFrom PubMed via Jisc Publications Router
dc.descriptionMarietta van der Linden - ORCID: 0000-0003-2256-6673 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-6673
dc.descriptionVoR added on 2023-01-10
dc.description.abstractSomatosensory function of the lower limbs is rarely assessed in children with upper motor neuron lesions despite its potential relevance for motor function. We explored consensus regarding somatosensory categories (exteroception, proprioception, interoception, and body awareness), modalities, and outcome measures relevant to lower limb motor function. Fifteen international experts with experience of somatosensory function assessment participated in this Delphi study. Surveys of four rounds, conducted online, included questions on the relevance of somatosensory categories and modalities for motor function and on the use of potential outcome measures in clinical practice. The experts reached consensus on the relevance of six modalities of the categories exteroception, proprioception, and body awareness. Based on their feedback, we formulated three core criteria for somatosensory outcome measures, namely suitability for clinical practice, child-friendliness, and relevance for motor function. None of the nine available outcome measures fulfilled each criterion. The experts also highlighted the importance of using and interpreting the tests in relation to the child's activity and participation. There was expert consensus on three categories and six modalities of somatosensory function relevant for lower limb motor function. However, existing outcome measures will need to be adapted for use in paediatric clinical practice. IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONConsensus was established for the categories and modalities of somatosensory function relevant for lower limb motor function of children with UMN lesion.Outcome measures should cover tactile function, joint movement and joint position and dynamic position sense, and spatial and structural body representation.None of the nine existing outcome measures fulfilled the core criteria: feasibility for clinical practice, child-friendliness, and relevance to motor function.
dc.languageeng
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceeissn: 1464-5165
dc.subjectBody representation
dc.subjectBody awareness
dc.subjectBody schema
dc.subjectBody image
dc.subjectProprioception
dc.subjecttactile function
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleWhat are the relevant categories, modalities, and outcome measures for assessing lower limb somatosensory function in children with upper motor neuron lesions? A Delphi study.en
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.date.updated2022-08-13T01:00:32Z
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.publicationdate2022-07-29
refterms.dateAccepted2022-07-10
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
qmu.authorMercer, Tom
qmu.authorvan der Linden, Marietta
qmu.centreCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Researchen
dc.description.statuspub
refterms.versionVoR
refterms.dateDeposit2022-09-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)