Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.contributor.authorSoh, Shawn Leng-Hsien
dc.contributor.authorLane, Judith
dc.contributor.authorLim, Ashleigh Yoke-Hwee
dc.contributor.authorMujtaba, Mariana Shariq
dc.contributor.authorTan, Chee-Wee
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T14:26:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T14:26:52Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.identifierpubmed: 36119555
dc.identifierdoi: 10.22540/JFSF-07-151
dc.identifierpii: JFSF-7-151
dc.identifierpmc: PMC9433947
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12605/12605.pdf
dc.identifier.citationSoh, S.L.-H., Lane, J., Lim, A.Y.-H., Mujtaba, M.S. and Tan, C.-W. (2022) ‘Interventions and measurement instruments used for falls efficacy in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review’, Journal of Frailty, Sarcopenia and Falls, 07(03), pp. 151–164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-151.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12605
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-151
dc.descriptionFrom PubMed via Jisc Publications Router
dc.descriptionHistory: accepted 2022-03-20
dc.descriptionPublication status: epublish
dc.descriptionVoR added 2023-01-05
dc.descriptionShawn Leng-Hsien Soh - ORCID: 0000-0002-8725-5182 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8725-5182
dc.descriptionJudith Lane - ORCID: 0000-0003-0413-8421 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-8421
dc.description.abstractFalls efficacy has been defined as perceived self-belief in the prevention and management of falls. In the case of community-dwelling older adults, it is essential that interventions should address the different aspects of falls efficacy in terms of balance confidence, balance recovery confidence, safe landing confidence and post-fall recovery confidence to improve their agency to deal with falls. This review aims to provide the current landscape of falls efficacy interventions and measurement instruments. A literature search of five electronic databases was conducted to extract relevant trials from January 2010 to September 2021, and the CASP tool for critical appraisal was applied to assess the quality and applicability of the studies. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials evaluating falls efficacy as a primary or secondary outcome for community-dwelling older adults. A total of 302 full texts were reviewed, with 47 selected for inclusion involving 7,259 participants across 14 countries. A total of 63 interventions were identified, using exercise and other components to target different aspects of falls efficacy. The novel contribution of this article is to highlight that those interventions were applied to address the different fall-related self-efficacies across pre-fall, near-fall, fall landing and completed fall stages. Appropriate measurement instruments need to be used to support empirical evidence of clinical effectiveness. [Abstract copyright: Copyright: © 2022 Hylonome Publications.]
dc.languageeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceeissn: 2459-4148
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectFalls efficacy
dc.subjectOlder adults
dc.subjectOutcome measures
dc.subjectInterventions
dc.titleInterventions and measurement instruments used for falls efficacy in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-20
dc.date.updated2022-10-03T01:03:35Z
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.publicationdate2022-09
refterms.dateAccepted2022-03-20
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
qmu.authorSoh, Shawn Leng-Hsien
qmu.authorLane, Judith
qmu.centreCentre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research
dc.description.statuspub
refterms.versionVoR
refterms.dateDeposit2022-10-04


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)