Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcVittie, Chris
dc.contributor.authorMcKinlay, Andy
dc.contributor.authorWiddicombe, Sue
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:30:08Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifierER1281
dc.identifier.citationMcVittie, C., McKinlay, A. & Widdicombe, S. (2003) Committed to (un)equal opportunities?: 'New ageism' and the older worker., British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 42, , pp. 595-612,
dc.identifier.issn1446665
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466603322595293
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/1281
dc.description.abstractIn recent years the principle of equality of opportunity in employment has been widely promoted as a means of addressing the marginalization of various groups of workers, including older workers. Evidence suggests, however, that equal opportunities have not improved prospects for older workers. The present study employs discourse analysis to examine a variety of accounts of those responsible for employment within a number of organizations. Analysis shows that these accounts are rhetorically oriented towards potential attributions of age discrimination. As evidence of a non-discriminatory stance, participants attend to possible shortcomings in written policies by making explicit their organizations' equal opportunity practices. In describing their workforces as comprising predominantly younger employees, however, they make only implicit reference to practices involving older workers. When they account for the apparent age imbalances in their workforces, they attribute these imbalances to factors outwith their control so that the organization's practices become completely 'invisible'. The contrast between this 'invisibility' and explicit claims to be committed to equal opportunities allows participants to position themselves as non-discriminating employers and at the same time justifies the marginalization of older workers.
dc.format.extent595-612
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Society
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Social Psychology
dc.titleCommitted to (un)equal opportunities?: 'New ageism' and the older worker.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultydiv_PaS
dc.description.volume42
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1348/014466603322595293
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid1281
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorMcVittie, Chris
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number4


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record