Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Martin
dc.contributor.authorMcPake, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T22:02:13Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T22:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2004-11-13
dc.identifierER158
dc.identifier.citationMcKee, M. & McPake, B. (2004) Commentary : the devil is in the detail, BMJ, vol. 329, , pp. 1175-1176,
dc.identifier.issn1468-5833
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1175
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/158
dc.description.abstractOkuonzi argues that the introduction of market reforms, into the Ugandan health system has been a failure.1 However, health systems are extremely complex and, as the debate about the British internal market shows, attribution of cause and effect is far from easy. The situation in Uganda is equally complex, with reforms taking place against a background of regional conflict, growing inequalities, and changes in other sectors. Furthermore, while Okuonzi focuses on hospitals, it is equally important to look at primary care, which the Ugandan reforms have sought to strengthen.
dc.format.extent1175-1176
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ
dc.titleCommentary : the devil is in the detail
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultysch_iih
dc.description.volume329
dc.identifier.doihttp://10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1175
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid158
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorMcPake, Barbara
dc.description.statuspub


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record