Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWrench, Alan A.
dc.contributor.authorScobbie, James M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T15:52:30Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T15:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2008-12
dc.identifierER2012
dc.identifier.citationWrench, A. & Scobbie, J. (2008-12) High-speed Cineloop Ultrasound vs. Video Ultrasound Tongue Imaging: Comparison of Front and Back Lingual Gesture Location and Relative Timing., Proceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP).
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2012
dc.description.abstractWe compare two methods of acquiring ultrasound tongue images. A new system capable of recording directly from the cineloop image buffer at a high frame rate and which is more accurately synchronized with audio is compared with an optimised method of recording images via the NTSC video output of an ultrasound machine. As a focus for this comparison we gathered representative data on English /l from a single speaker, using a headset restraint system. Both systems performed well, but while the video system is at its limits, the cineloop system is inherently more accurate and offers greater opportunity for development.
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Eighth International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP)
dc.titleHigh-speed Cineloop Ultrasound vs. Video Ultrasound Tongue Imaging: Comparison of Front and Back Lingual Gesture Location and Relative Timing.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultycasl
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid2012
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorScobbie, James M.
dc.description.statuspub


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record