Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Nursing
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Nursing
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    What difference does (good) HRM make?

    View/Open
    what.pdf (237.5Kb)
    Date
    2004-06-07
    Author
    Buchan, James
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Buchan, J. (2004) What difference does (good) HRM make?, Human Resources for Health, vol. 2, , ,
    Abstract
    The importance of human resources management (HRM) to the success or failure of health system performance has, until recently, been generally overlooked. In recent years it has been increasingly recognised that getting HR policy and management right has to be at the core of any sustainable solution to health system performance. In comparison to the evidence base on health care reformrelated issues of health system finance and appropriate purchaser/provider incentive structures, there is very limited information on the HRM dimension or its impact. Despite the limited, but growing, evidence base on the impact of HRM on organisational performance in other sectors, there have been relatively few attempts to assess the implications of this evidence for the health sector. This paper examines this broader evidence base on HRM in other sectors and examines some of the underlying issues related to good HRM in the health sector. The paper considers how human resource management (HRM) has been defined and evaluated in other sectors. Essentially there are two sub-themes: how have HRM interventions been defined? and how have the effects of these interventions been measured in order to identify which interventions are most effective? In other words, what is good HRM? The paper argues that it is not only the organisational context that differentiates the health sector from many other sectors, in terms of HRM. Many of the measures of organisational performance are also unique. Performance in the health sector can be fully assessed only by means of indicators that are sector-specific. These can focus on measures of clinical activity or workload (e.g. staff per occupied bed, or patient acuity measures), on measures of output (e.g. number of patients treated) or, less frequently, on measures of outcome (e.g. mortality rates or rate of post-surgery complications). The paper also stresses the need for a fit between the HRM approach and the organisational characteristics, context and priorities, and for recognition that so-called bundles of linked and coordinated HRM interventions will be more likely to achieve sustained improvements in organisational performance than single or uncoordinated interventions.
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-2-6
    URI
    http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/6/abstract
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/21
    Collections
    • Nursing

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap