Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWolters, Maria
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorDePlacido, Christine
dc.contributor.authorLiddell, Amy
dc.contributor.authorOwens, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T15:51:56Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T15:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2007-08
dc.identifierER2109
dc.identifier.citationWolters, M., Campbell, P., DePlacido, C., Liddell, A. & Owens, D. (2007) Making Speech Synthesis More Accessible to Older People., 6th ISCA Workshops on Speech Synthesis(SSW-6), , , ,
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/~kjt/research/match/resources/documents/isca07-wolters.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2109
dc.descriptionConference in Bonn, Germany, 2007.
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we report on an experiment that tested users' ability to understand the content of spoken auditory reminders. Users heard meeting reminders and medication reminders spoken in both a natural and a synthetic voice. Our results show that older users can understand synthetic speech as well as younger users provided that the prompt texts are well-designed, using familiar words and contextual cues. As soon as unfamiliar and complex words are introduced, users' hearing affects how well they can understand the synthetic voice, even if their hearing would pass common screening tests for speech synthesis experiments. Although hearing thresholds correlate best with users' performance, central auditory processing may also influence performance, especially when complex errors are made.
dc.relation.ispartof6th ISCA Workshops on Speech Synthesis(SSW-6)
dc.titleMaking Speech Synthesis More Accessible to Older People.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultycasl
dc.description.referencetext[1] B. Langner and A. W. Black, Using Speech In Noise to Improve Understandability for Elderly Listeners,- in Proceedings of ASRU, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2005. [2] R. W. Roring, F. G. Hines, and N. Charness, Age differences in identifying words in synthetic speech,- Hum Factors, vol. 49, pp. 25-31, 2007. [3] S. Duffy and D. Pisoni, Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpretation,- Language and Speech, vol. 35, pp. 351-389, 1992. [4] C. R. Paris, M. H. Thomas, R. D. Gilson, and J. P. Kincaid, Linguistic cues and memory for synthetic and natural speech,- Human Factors, vol. 42, pp. 421-431, 2000. [5] P. Luce, T. Feustel, and D. Pisoni, Capacity demands in short-term memory for synthetic and nautral speech,- Human Factors, vol. 25, pp. 17-32, 1983. [6] J. Al-Awar Smither, The processing of synthetic speech by older and younger adults,- in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Innovations for Interactions, 12-16 Oct. 1992. Atlanta, GA, USA: Human Factors Soc, 1992, pp. 190-192. [7] A. Black and P. Taylor, The festival speech synthesis system,- Human Communication Research Centre, Tech. Rep. TR-83, 1997. [8] B. Sutton, J. King, K. Hux, and D. Beukelman, Younger and older adults' rate performance when listening to synthetic speech,- Augmentative and Alternative Communication, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 147-153, 1995. [9] M. Wolters, P. Campbell, C. DePlacido, A. Liddell, and D. Owens, The effect of hearing loss on the intelligibility of synthetic speech,- in Proc. Intl. Conf. Phon. Sci., Aug. 2007. [10] T. A. Salthouse, Where in an ordered sequence of variables do independent age-related effects occur?- J.Gerontol.B Psychol.Sci.Soc.Sci., vol. 51, pp. 166-178, 1996. [11] J. R. Crawford, G. Smith, E. A. Maylor, S. della Sala, and R. H. Logie, The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample,- Memory, vol. 11, pp. 261-275, ,Psychological physiopathology 2003. [12] N. Unsworth and R. Engle, Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects,- Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 54, pp. 68-80, 2006. [13] P. Rabbitt, Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ,- Acta Otolaryngol.Suppl, vol. 476, pp. 167-175, 1990. [14] British Society of Audiology, Pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels,- 2004. [15] R.W. Keith, The Random Gap Detection Test. St. Louis: AUDITEC, 2000. [16] D. Owens, P. Campbell, A. Liddell, C. DePlacido, and M. Wolters, Random gap detection threshold: A useful measure of auditory ageing?- in Proc. Europ. Cong. Fed. Audiol. Heidelberg, Germany, Jun. [17] K. B. Snell, F. M. Mapes, E. D. Hickman, and D. R. Frisina, Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity,- Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 112, pp. 720-727, 2002. [18] A. Boothroyd, Developments in speech audiometry,- British Journal of Audiometry, vol. 2, pp. 3-10, 1968. [19] M. Pollack, Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elders with Cognitive Impairment,- AI Magazine, vol. 26, pp. 9-24, 2005. [20] J. R. Dubno and H. Levitt, Predicting Consonant Confusions from Acoustic Analysis,- Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 69, pp. 249-261, 1981. [21] S. Gordon-Salant, Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing,- J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 80, pp. 1599-1607, 1986. [22] M. A. Aylett, C. J. Pidcock, and M. E. Fraser, The cerevoice blizzard entry 2006: A prototype database unit selection engine,- in Proceedings of Blizzard Challenge Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid2109
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorDePlacido, Christine
qmu.authorCampbell, Pauline
dc.description.statuspub


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record