Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuchan, James
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:38:06Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:38:06Z
dc.date.issued2004-06-07
dc.identifierER21
dc.identifier.citationBuchan, J. (2004) What difference does (good) HRM make?, Human Resources for Health, vol. 2, , ,
dc.identifier.issn1478-4491
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-2-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.human-resources-health.com/content/2/1/6/abstract
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/21
dc.description.abstractThe importance of human resources management (HRM) to the success or failure of health system performance has, until recently, been generally overlooked. In recent years it has been increasingly recognised that getting HR policy and management right has to be at the core of any sustainable solution to health system performance. In comparison to the evidence base on health care reformrelated issues of health system finance and appropriate purchaser/provider incentive structures, there is very limited information on the HRM dimension or its impact. Despite the limited, but growing, evidence base on the impact of HRM on organisational performance in other sectors, there have been relatively few attempts to assess the implications of this evidence for the health sector. This paper examines this broader evidence base on HRM in other sectors and examines some of the underlying issues related to good HRM in the health sector. The paper considers how human resource management (HRM) has been defined and evaluated in other sectors. Essentially there are two sub-themes: how have HRM interventions been defined? and how have the effects of these interventions been measured in order to identify which interventions are most effective? In other words, what is good HRM? The paper argues that it is not only the organisational context that differentiates the health sector from many other sectors, in terms of HRM. Many of the measures of organisational performance are also unique. Performance in the health sector can be fully assessed only by means of indicators that are sector-specific. These can focus on measures of clinical activity or workload (e.g. staff per occupied bed, or patient acuity measures), on measures of output (e.g. number of patients treated) or, less frequently, on measures of outcome (e.g. mortality rates or rate of post-surgery complications). The paper also stresses the need for a fit between the HRM approach and the organisational characteristics, context and priorities, and for recognition that so-called bundles of linked and coordinated HRM interventions will be more likely to achieve sustained improvements in organisational performance than single or uncoordinated interventions.
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Resources for Health
dc.titleWhat difference does (good) HRM make?
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultysch_nur
dc.description.referencetext1. Mills A: Improving the Efficiency of the Public Sector Health Services in Developing Countries: Bureaucratic versus Market Approaches. PHP Departmental Publication no.17 London: London School of Tropical Medicine; 1995. 2. Cassels A: Health sector reform: key issues in developing countries. Journal of International Development 1995, 7(3):329-347. 3. Dussault G, Dubois C: Human resources for health policies: a critical component in health policies. Human Resources for Health 1:1. 2003 14 April 4. Diallo K, Zurn P, Gupta N, Dal Poz M: Monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health: an international perspective. Human Resources for Health 1:3. 2003 14 April 5. Martinez J, Martineau T: Human resources in healthcare reform: a review of current issues. Health Policy and Planning 1998, 13(4):345-358. 6. Buchan J: Health sector reform and human resources: lessons from the United Kingdom. Health Policy and Planning 2000, 15:319-325. 7. Van Lerberghe W, Adams O, Ferrinho P: Human resources impact assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2002, 80(7):525. 8. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD): The Change Agenda: People Management and Business Performance London: CIPD; 2001. 9. Caulkin S: The time is now. People Management :32-34. 2001 30 August 10. Richardson R, Thompson M: The Impact of People Management Practices on Business Performance: A Literature Review London: Institute of Personnel and Development; 1999. 11. West M, Patterson M, Lawthom R, Nickell S: The Impact of People Management Practices on business performance. IPD Research Paper 22 London: Institute of Personnel and Development; 1997. 12. MacDuffie J: Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organisational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 1995, 48(2):197-221. 13. Pfeffer J: Competitive Advantage through People Boston: Harvard Business School; 1994. 14. Pfeffer J: The Human Equation: Building Profits By Putting People First Boston: Harvard Business School; 1998. 15. Huselid M: The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38(3):635-672. 16. Guest D: Personnel's paradox. People Management :25-29. 2001 27 Sept 17. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD): Sustaining Success in Difficult Times: Research Summary London: CIPD; 2002. 18. Eaton S: Beyond unloving care: linking human resource management and patient care quality in nursing homes. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2000, 11(3):591-616. 19. Rondeau K, Wagar T: Impact of human resource management practices on nursing home performance. Health Services Management Research 2001, 14(3):192-202. 20. Sovie M, Jawad A: Hospital restructuring and its impact on outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration 2001, 31(12):588-600. 21. Aiken L, Clarke S, Sloane D: Hospital staffing, organisation, and quality of care: cross national findings. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2002, 14(1):5-13. 22. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K: Nursestaffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 346:1715-1722. 2002 May 30 23. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH: Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association 2002, 288(16):1987-1993. 24. Bond C, Raehl C, Franke T: Interrelationships amongst mortality rates, drug costs, total cost of care and length of stay in United States hospitals: summary and recommendations for clinical pharmacy services and staffing. Pharmacotherapy 2002, 21(2):129-141. 25. Hendrix T, Foreman S: Optimal long term care nurse staffing levels. Nursing Economics 2001, 19(4):164-175. 26. Tourangeau A, Giovanetti P, Tu J, Wood M: Nursing related determinants of 30 day mortality for hospitalized patients. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2002, 33(4):71-88. 27. Ticker J: Patient volume, staffing and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation. The Lancet 2002, 359(9301):99-107. 28. Kovner C, Jones C, Zhan C, Gergen P, Basu J: Nurse staffing and post surgical adverse events: An Analysis of administrative data from a sample of US hospitals 1990-1996. Health Services Research 2002, 27(3):611-629. 29. Clarke S, Sloane D, Aiken L: Effects of hospital staffing and organisational climate on needlestick injuries. American Journal of Public Health 2002, 92(7):1115-1119. 30. McClure M, Poulin M, Sovie M: Magnet Hospitals: Attraction Retention of Professional Nurses Kansas City: American Nurses Association; 1983. 31. Kramer M, Schmalenberg C: Job Satisfaction and retention. Insights for the 90s. Part 2. Nursing 1991, 21(3):51-55. 32. Aiken LH, Smith HL, Lake ET: Lower Medicare mortality among a set of hospitals known for good nursing care. Medical Care 1994, 32(8):771-787. 33. Buchan J, Ball J, Rafferty A: A Lasting Attraction? The Magnet Accreditation of Rochdale Infirmary 2004 [http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/hsru/staff/ PDFs/Rochdale.pdf]. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 34. Hornby P, Forte P: Guidelines for Introducing Human Resource Indicators to Monitor Health Service Performance Keele: Centre for Health Planning and Management, Keele University; 2002. 35. American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC): The Magnet Recognition Program for Excellence in Nursing Service. Health Care Organizations Instructions and Application Process. Manual 2000-2001 Washington DC: ANCC; 2001. 36. Buchan J: Staffing and Skill Mix: Indicators of effectiveness? Geneva: World Health Organization (unpublished document); 2003.
dc.description.volume2
dc.identifier.doihttp://10.1186/1478-4491-2-6
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid21
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorBuchan, James
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number6


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record