Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllison, Marion
dc.contributor.authorFenger, M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:29:54Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:29:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-10
dc.identifierER2956
dc.identifier.citationEllison, M. & Fenger, M. (2013) New' welfare in practice: trends, challenges and dilemmas, Social Policy and Society, vol. 12, , pp. 547-552,
dc.identifier.issn14747464
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1474746413000298
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2956
dc.description.abstractEuropean welfare states have a tradition of compensating for social risks. But across Europe, remarkable transformations may be observed that shift the focus from a needs/rights based compensatory approach towards a more individualistic 'social risk management' approach to welfare (see Schmid, 2006; Abrahamson, 2010). The basic idea of social risk management is that citizens have their own responsibility for preventing social risks. The 'new' welfare state mirrors this approach by adopting the role of equipping individual citizens for this task. The concept of the 'new welfare state' has been discussed under different labels, including 'positive welfare' (Giddens, 1998), 'enabling welfare' (Gilbert, 2002), 'new welfare' (Taylor-Gooby, 2008) and 'social investment state' (Engelen et al., 2007). Copyright Cambridge University Press 2013.
dc.format.extent547-552
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Policy and Society
dc.titleNew' welfare in practice: trends, challenges and dilemmas
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultydiv_PaS
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doihttp://10.1017/S1474746413000298
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid2956
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorEllison, Marion
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number4


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record