Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZou, G.
dc.contributor.authorWei, X.
dc.contributor.authorWitter, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorYin, J.
dc.contributor.authorWalley, J.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, S.
dc.contributor.authorYang, H.
dc.contributor.authorChen, J.
dc.contributor.authorTian, G.
dc.contributor.authorMei, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T22:02:26Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T22:02:26Z
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.identifierER3231
dc.identifier.citationZou, G., Wei, X., Witter, S., Yin, J., Walley, J., Liu, S., Yang, H., Chen, J., Tian, G. & Mei, J. (2013) Incremental cost-effectiveness of improving treatment results among migrant tuberculosis patients in Shanghai, International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 17, , pp. 1056-1064,
dc.identifier.issn10273719
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0799
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/3231
dc.description.abstractSETTING: Two projects were introduced in October 2007 to improve treatment completion among rural-to-urban migrant tuberculosis (TB) patients in Shanghai. The Communicable Disease Research Consortium (COMDIS) project provided financial incentives to poor patients, whereas the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) project provided incentives to all patients and increased staff time. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of these two projects. METHODS: Case study. Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. The primary measure of effectiveness was the treatment completion rate. The incremental cost- effectiveness ratio was calculated as the additional cost of the intervention divided by the additional percentage of patients completing treatment compared to controls. RESULTS: Post intervention, the treatment completion rates in the COMDIS and Global Fund projects were respectively 89% and 88%, 17% and 16% higher than in the control district (76%). For one additional percent of patients to complete treatment, the additional cost of the COMDIS intervention was US$1891, 91% lower than that of the Global Fund intervention (US$21 904). CONCLUSION: The intervention that addressed the financial barriers of poor patients was more cost-effective than the comprehensive intervention that provided assistance to both patients and providers. Further study is needed to understand the process of interventions prior to wider scale-up. 2013 The Union.
dc.format.extent1056-1064
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
dc.titleIncremental cost-effectiveness of improving treatment results among migrant tuberculosis patients in Shanghai
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dc.description.facultysch_iih
dc.description.volume17
dc.identifier.doihttp://10.5588/ijtld.12.0799
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid3231
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorWitter, Sophie
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number8


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record