Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHealy, Erin
dc.contributor.authorYaxley, Alison
dc.contributor.authorIsenring, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorBannerman, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:33:40Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:33:40Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifierER3497
dc.identifier.citationHealy, E., Yaxley, A., Isenring, E., Bannerman, E. & Miller, M. (2014) Ability of existing Malnutrition Screening Tools to identify risk of starvation, sarcopenia and cachexia: A systematic review, e-SPEN Journal, vol. 9, , pp. 109-e122,
dc.identifier.issn22128263
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnme.2014.04.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/3497
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: Unintentional weight loss (UWL) is common in older adults, occurring in 27% of those aged 65 years and older, and is associated with increased mortality. It is critical to identify and treat the causes of UWL appropriately, with the three primary syndromes being starvation, sarcopenia and cachexia. Whilst Malnutrition Screening Tools are well established, it is unclear if they have the ability to detect separately the risk of those three syndromes. It is therefore the aim of this review to assess whether existing Malnutrition Screening Tools have the potential to screen for risk of starvation, sarcopenia or cachexia according to current diagnostic criteria. Methods: Five databases were systematically searched for studies describing the original development and/or validation of Malnutrition Screening Tools. A total of 33 articles describing 31 tools were reviewed. Results: Twenty tools appeared potentially appropriate for screening of starvation risk, with one tool incorporating all ideal measures. No tools contained all currently accepted components required for screening sarcopenia or cachexia risk. Key criteria that were commonly absent included assessment of muscle strength, muscle mass and physical function for sarcopenia risk, and fatigue for cachexia, and weight loss was often not quantified, or specified as unintentional. Conclusions: Ideally, future development of Malnutrition Screening Tools will include the ability to separately identify risk of starvation, sarcopenia and cachexia with a high level of validity and reliability, and should also have the ability to facilitate timely and appropriate referrals and treatment for these syndromes in dietetic practice. 2014.
dc.format.extent109-e122
dc.relation.ispartofe-SPEN Journal
dc.titleAbility of existing Malnutrition Screening Tools to identify risk of starvation, sarcopenia and cachexia: A systematic review
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultysch_die
dc.description.volume9
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1016/j.clnme.2014.04.005
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid3497
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorBannerman, Elaine
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record