|dc.description.referencetext|| W. G. Hamilton, S. Sritulanondha, and C. A. Engh Jr., Results
of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard
and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review,-
Orthopedics, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. e500-e503, 2011.
 T. Sumino, H. R. Gadikota, K. M. Varadarajan, Y.-M. Kwon,
H. E. Rubash, and G. Li, Do high flexion posterior stabilised
total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta
analysis,- International Orthopaedics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1309-
 Z. Liu and H. Yang, Comparison of the minimally invasive
and standard medial parapatellar approaches for total knee
arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis,- The Journal
of International Medical Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1607-1617,
 I. Alcelik, M. Sukeik, R. Pollock, A. Misra, A. Naguib, and F. S.
Haddad, Comparing the mid-vastus and medial parapatellar
approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of short
term outcomes,- The Knee, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 229-236, 2012.
 C. R. Costa, A. J. Johnson, S. F. Harwin,M. A.Mont, and P.M.
Bonutti, Critical review of minimally invasive approaches in
knee arthroplasty,- The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 26, no. 1,
pp. 41-50, 2013.
 R. Juosponis, S. Tarasevicius, A. Smailys, and R. J. Kalesinskas,
Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement
performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy:
controlled randomised trial,- International Orthopaedics,
vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1233-1237, 2009.
 F. R. Kolisek, P.M. Bonutti,W. J. Hozack et al., Clinical experience
using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee
arthroplasty : early results of a prospective randomized study
compared to a standard approach,- Journal of Arthroplasty, vol.
22, no. 1, pp. 8-13, 2007.
 R. R. Karpman and H. L. Smith, Comparison of the early
results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total
knee arthroplasty : a prospective, randomized study,- Journal of
Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 681-688, 2009.
 T. Karachalios, D. Giotikas, N. Roidis, L. Poultsides, K. Bargiotas,
and K.N.Malizos, Total knee replacement performed with
either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective
randomised clinical and radiological trial,- Journal of Bone and
Joint Surgery Series B, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 584-591, 2008.
 B. J.Nestor, C. E. Toulson, S. I. Backus, S. L. Lyman,K. L. Foote,
and R. E. Windsor, Mini- midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar
approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded
study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty,-
The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5.e1-11.e1, 2010.
 S. P. Guy, M. A. Farndon, J. L. Conroy, C. Bennett, A. J.
Grainger, andN. J. London, A prospective randomised study of
minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared
with standard total knee arthroplasty,- The Knee, vol. 19, no. 6,
pp. 866-871, 2012.
 S. L. Jarvis, A. K. Johnson-Wo, B. R. Onstot et al., Differences
between standard and minimally invasive parapatellar surgical
approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the tasks of sitting and
standing,- The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 249-
 World Health Organization, International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health,WHO, Geneva, Switzerland,
 D. M. Kennedy, P. W. Stratford, J. Wessel, J. D. Gollish, and
D. Penney, Assessing stability and change of four performance
measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following
total hip and knee arthroplasty,- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,
vol. 6, article 3, 2005.
 M. P. Kadaba, H. K. Ramakrishnan, and M. E.Wootten, Measurement
of lower extremity kinematics during level walking,-
Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 383-392, 1990.
 P. M. Grant, P. M. Dall, S. L. Mitchell, and M. H. Granat,
Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and
cadence in community-dwelling older adults,- Journal of Aging
and Physical Activity, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 201-214, 2008.
 J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences,
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2nd edition,
 S. A. Bridgman, G. Walley, G. MacKenzie, D. Clement, D.
Griffiths, and N. Maffulli, Sub-vastus approach is more effective
than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee
arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial,- The Knee, vol. 16,
no. 3, pp. 216-222, 2009.
 P. Essving, K. Axelsson, L. Otterborg et al., Minimally invasive
surgery did not improve outcome compared to conventional
surgery following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using
local infiltration analgesia: a randomized controlled trial with
40 patients,- ActaOrthopaedica, vol. 83,no. 6, pp. 634-641, 2012.
 P.Mukherjee, J. Press, andM. Hockings, Mid-vastus vs medial
para-patellar approach in total knee replacement-time to
discharge,- The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, vol. 29, pp. 19-22,
 M. Maru, G. Akra, I. McMurtry, and A. Port, A prospective
comparative study of the midvastus and medial parapatellar
approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the early postoperative
period,- European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology,
vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 473-476, 2009.
 R. E. White Jr., J. K. Allman, J. A. Trauger, and B. H. Dales,
Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar
surgical approaches,- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
Research, no. 367, pp. 117-122, 1999.||