Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNutton, R. W.
dc.contributor.authorWade, F. A.
dc.contributor.authorCoutts, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorvan der Linden, Marietta
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:46:08Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierER3916
dc.identifier.citationNutton, R., Wade, F., Coutts, F. & van der Linden, M. (2014) Short Term Recovery of Function following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Study of the Medial Parapatellar and Midvastus Approaches, Arthritis, vol. 2014, , pp. 01-Jul,
dc.identifier.issn2090-1984
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/173857
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/3916
dc.description.abstractThis pilot double blind randomised controlled study aimed to investigate whether the midvastus (MV) approach without patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) resulted in improved recovery of function compared to the medial parapatellar (MP) approach. Patients were randomly allocated to either the MV approach or the MP approach. Achievements of inpatient mobility milestones were recorded. Knee kinematics, muscle strength, Timed Up and Go, WOMAC, and daily step count were assessed before and up to six months after surgery. Cohen's effect size
dc.format.extent01-Jul
dc.relation.ispartofArthritis
dc.titleShort Term Recovery of Function following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomised Study of the Medial Parapatellar and Midvastus Approaches
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultysch_phy
dc.description.referencetext[1] W. G. Hamilton, S. Sritulanondha, and C. A. Engh Jr., Results of prospective, randomized clinical trials comparing standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized TKA: a focused review,- Orthopedics, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. e500-e503, 2011. [2] T. Sumino, H. R. Gadikota, K. M. Varadarajan, Y.-M. Kwon, H. E. Rubash, and G. Li, Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis,- International Orthopaedics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1309- 1319, 2011. [3] Z. Liu and H. Yang, Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis,- The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1607-1617, 2011. [4] I. Alcelik, M. Sukeik, R. Pollock, A. Misra, A. Naguib, and F. S. Haddad, Comparing the mid-vastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of short term outcomes,- The Knee, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 229-236, 2012. [5] C. R. Costa, A. J. Johnson, S. F. Harwin,M. A.Mont, and P.M. Bonutti, Critical review of minimally invasive approaches in knee arthroplasty,- The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 41-50, 2013. [6] R. Juosponis, S. Tarasevicius, A. Smailys, and R. J. Kalesinskas, Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial,- International Orthopaedics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1233-1237, 2009. [7] F. R. Kolisek, P.M. Bonutti,W. J. Hozack et al., Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty : early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach,- Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 8-13, 2007. [8] R. R. Karpman and H. L. Smith, Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty : a prospective, randomized study,- Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 681-688, 2009. [9] T. Karachalios, D. Giotikas, N. Roidis, L. Poultsides, K. Bargiotas, and K.N.Malizos, Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial,- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series B, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 584-591, 2008. [10] B. J.Nestor, C. E. Toulson, S. I. Backus, S. L. Lyman,K. L. Foote, and R. E. Windsor, Mini- midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty,- The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5.e1-11.e1, 2010. [11] S. P. Guy, M. A. Farndon, J. L. Conroy, C. Bennett, A. J. Grainger, andN. J. London, A prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty,- The Knee, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 866-871, 2012. [12] S. L. Jarvis, A. K. Johnson-Wo, B. R. Onstot et al., Differences between standard and minimally invasive parapatellar surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the tasks of sitting and standing,- The Journal of Knee Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 249- 256, 2013. [13] World Health Organization, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health,WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [14] D. M. Kennedy, P. W. Stratford, J. Wessel, J. D. Gollish, and D. Penney, Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty,- BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 6, article 3, 2005. [15] M. P. Kadaba, H. K. Ramakrishnan, and M. E.Wootten, Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking,- Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 383-392, 1990. [16] P. M. Grant, P. M. Dall, S. L. Mitchell, and M. H. Granat, Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults,- Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 201-214, 2008. [17] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1988. [18] S. A. Bridgman, G. Walley, G. MacKenzie, D. Clement, D. Griffiths, and N. Maffulli, Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial,- The Knee, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 216-222, 2009. [19] P. Essving, K. Axelsson, L. Otterborg et al., Minimally invasive surgery did not improve outcome compared to conventional surgery following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using local infiltration analgesia: a randomized controlled trial with 40 patients,- ActaOrthopaedica, vol. 83,no. 6, pp. 634-641, 2012. [20] P.Mukherjee, J. Press, andM. Hockings, Mid-vastus vs medial para-patellar approach in total knee replacement-time to discharge,- The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, vol. 29, pp. 19-22, 2009. [21] M. Maru, G. Akra, I. McMurtry, and A. Port, A prospective comparative study of the midvastus and medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the early postoperative period,- European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 473-476, 2009. [22] R. E. White Jr., J. K. Allman, J. A. Trauger, and B. H. Dales, Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches,- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 367, pp. 117-122, 1999.
dc.description.volume2014
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1155/2014/173857
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid3916
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorvan der Linden, Marietta
qmu.authorCoutts, Fiona
dc.description.statuspub


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record