Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaw, James
dc.contributor.authorGarret, Z.
dc.contributor.authorNye, Chad
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T08:53:05Z
dc.date.available2018-07-20T08:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2005-10-01
dc.identifier.citationLaw, J., Garret, Z. & Nye, C. (2005) The Specificity of a Systematic Review Is the Key to Its Value: A Response to Johnston (2005), Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, vol. 48, , pp. 1118-1120,
dc.identifier.issn10924388
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/414
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/078)
dc.description.abstractWe would like to thank the Editor for drawing to our attention Professor’s Johnston’s (2005) helpful commentary on our recent article in the Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research titled ‘‘The Efficacy of Treatment for Children With Developmental Speech and Language Delay/Disorder: A Meta-Analysis’’ (Law, Garrett, & Nye, 2004). Johnston’s comments are most welcome because we need clinicians and researchers to engage in the evidence-based practice debate and to reflect on the nature of evidence that they and others are likely to accept for informing both policy and practice. We would like to address the most salient concerns raised.
dc.format.extent1118-1120
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
dc.titleThe Specificity of a Systematic Review Is the Key to Its Value: A Response to Johnston (2005)
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultyNO DIVISION
dc.description.volume48
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/078)
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid414
rioxxterms.typearticle
rioxxterms.publicationdate01/10/2005
qmu.authorLaw, James
qmu.centreCASLen
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number5


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record