|dc.identifier.citation||Paul, L., Coulter, E., Miller, L., McFadyen, A., Dorfman, J. & Mattison, P. (2014) Web-based physiotherapy for people moderately affected with Multiple Sclerosis; quantitative and qualitative data from a randomized, controlled pilot study, Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 28, , pp. 924-935,
|dc.description.abstract||Objective: To explore the effectiveness and participant experience of web-based physiotherapy for
people moderately affected with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and to provide data to establish the sample size
required for a fully powered, definitive randomized controlled study.
Design: A randomized controlled pilot study.
Setting: Rehabilitation centre and participants' homes.
Subjects: Thirty community dwelling adults moderately affected by MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale
Interventions: Twelve weeks of individualised web-based physiotherapy completed twice per week or
usual care (control). Online exercise diaries were monitored; participants were telephoned weekly by the
physiotherapist and exercise programmes altered remotely by the physiotherapist as required.
Main measures: The following outcomes were completed at baseline and after 12 weeks; 25 Foot Walk,
Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, Leeds MS Quality of Life Scale,
MS-Related Symptom Checklist and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The intervention group also
completed a website evaluation questionnaire and interviews.
Results: Participants reported that website was easy to use, convenient, and motivating and would
be happy to use in the future. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome
measure, the timed 25ft walk in the intervention group (P=0.170), or other secondary outcome measures,
except the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (P=0.048). Effect sizes were generally small to moderate.
Conclusion: People with MS were very positive about web-based physiotherapy. The results suggested
that 80 participants, 40 in each group, would be sufficient for a fully powered, definitive randomized
|dc.description.referencetext||1. Kairy K, Lehoux P, Vincent C, et al. A systematic review
of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization
and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil
Rehabil 2009; 31: 427-447.
2. Brennan DM and Barker LM. Human factors in the development
and implementation of telerehabilitation systems.
J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 55-58.
3. Torsney K. Advantages and disadvantages of telerehabilitation
for persons with neurological disabilities.
NeuroRehabil 2003; 18: 183-185.
4. Wardell L, Hum S, Laizner AM, et al. Multiple Sclerosis
patients' interest in and likelihood of using online healthcare
services. Int J MS Care 2009; 11: 79-89.
5. Multiple Sclerosis Society. Web Accessibility Policy (v
1.0), UK: Multiple Sclerosis Society, 2010.
6. Egner A, Phillips VL, Vora R, et al. Depression, fatigue
and health-related quality of life among people with
advanced multiple sclerosis: Results from an exploratory
telerehabilitation study. NeuroRehabil 2003; 18:
7. Finlayson M (2005) Pilot study of an energy conservation
education programme delivered by telephone conference
call to people with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabil 2005;
8. Motl RW, Dlugonski D and Wojcicke TR. Internet intervention
for increasing physical activity in persons with
multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 116-128.
9. Dlugonski D, Motl RW and McAuley E. Increasing physical
activity in multiple sclerosis: Replicating Internet
intervention using objective and self-report outcomes. J
Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48: 1129-1136.
10. Dlugonski D, Motl RW, Mohr DC, et al. Internetdelivered
behavioural intervention to increase physical
actviity in persons with multiple sclerosis: Sustainability
and secondary outcomes. Psych Health Med 2012; 17:
11. Huijgen BC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Zampolini M,
et al. Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system
compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients
with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis.
J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 249-256.
12. Finkelstein J, Lapshin O, Castro H, et al. Home-based
physical rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis:
a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 1361-1374.
13. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple
sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS).
Neurology 1983; 33: 1444-1452.
14. Cutter GR, Baier ML, Rudick RA, et al. (1999)
Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite
as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain 1999; 122:
15. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, et al.
Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument.
C J Public Health 1992; 83: S7-11.
16. Podsiadlo D and Richardson S. The timed Up & Go-: a
test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J
Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39:142-148.
17. Hobart J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The Multiple
Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) A new patient- based
outcome measure. Brain 2001; 124: 962-973.
18. Ford HL, Gerry E, Tennant A, et al. Developing a diseasespecific
quality of life measure for people with multiple
sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 247-258.
19. Gulick EE. Model confirmation of the MS-Related
Symptom Checklist. Nurs Res 1989; 38: 147-153.
20. Zigmond AS and Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety
and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67:
21. Corriveau H, Tousignant M, Gosselin S, et al. The use of
telerehabilitation to provide an exercise program to improve
balance in a post-stroke population: preliminary results.
ICOST Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2012, volume
7251, pp. 58-65. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag
22. Sanford JA, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, et al. The effects
of in-home rehabilitation on task self-efficacy in mobilityimpaired
adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J
Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 1641-1648.
23. Piron L, Tonin P, Cortese F, et al. Post-stroke arm motor
telerehabilitation web-based. In: Proceeds of IEEE 5th
Int. Workshop Virtual Rehabilitation, 2006, pp.145-148.
24. Lum PS, Uswatta G, Taub E, et al. A telerehabilitation
approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement
therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43: 391-400.
25. Miller L, Paul L, Mattison P, et al. Evaluation of a homebased
physiotherapy programme for those with moderate
to severe multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot
study. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 720-730.
26. Learmonth YC, Paul L, Miller L, et al. The effects of a
12-week leisure centre-based, group exercise intervention
for people moderately affected with multiple sclerosis: a
randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2011; 26:
27. Durmus D, Alayli G, Cil E, et al. Effects of a home-based
exercise program on quality of life, fatigue, and depression
in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol
Int 2009; 29: 673-7.
28. Regensteiner JG, Meyer TJ, Krupski WC, et al. Hospital
vs home-based exercise rehabilitation for patients with
peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Angiology 1997; 48: