|dc.description.referencetext||1. Perry L, Malkin R: Effectiveness of medical equipment donations to
improve health systems: how much medical equipment is broken in the
developing world? Med Biol Eng Comput 2011, 49:719-722.
2. World Health Organization: Medical devices: Managing the Mismatch (An
outcome of the Priority Medical Devices project). Geneva: World Health
3. World Health Organization: Local Production and Technology Transfer to
Increase Access to Medical Devices: Addressing the barriers and challenges in
low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
4. World Health Organization: Background paper 8: future public health
needs: communalities and differences between high- and low-resource
settings in Geneva. In Medical Devices: Managing the Mismatch (An
outcome of the Priority Medical Devices Project). 2010.
5. Howitt P, Darzi A, Yang GZ, Ashrafian H, Atun R, Barlow J, Blakemore A, Bull
AMJ, Car J, Conteh L, Cooke GS, Ford N, Gregson SJ, Kerr K, King D,
Kulendran M, Malkin R, Majeed A, Matlin S, Merrified R, Penfolf H, Reid SD,
Smith PC, Stevens MM, Templeton MR, Vincent C, Wilson E: Technologies
for global health. Lancet 2012, 380:507-535.
6. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence: Guide to the Methods of
Technology Appraisal 2013. 2013, [http://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg9/
7. World Health Organization: Background Paper 3: Clinical evidence for
medical devices: regulatory processes focusing on Europe and the
United States of America Geneva. In Medical Devices: Managing the
Mismatch (An outcome of the Priority Medical Devices Project). 2010.
8. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: HTA policy
9. Canadian Health Technology Assessment Task Group: Health technology
strategy 1. 0 final report. [http://www.who.int/medical_devices/
10. Fricke FU, Dauben HP: Health technology assessment: a perspective from
Germany. Value Health 2009, 12(Suppl 2):S20-S27.
11. World Health Organization: Baseline Country Survey on Medical Devices.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
12. UNAIDS & World Health Organization: Guidelines for Using HIV Testing
Technologies in Surveillance. 2009.
13. Rieder HL, Van Deun A, Kam KM, Kim SJ, Chonde RM, Trbucq A, Urbanczik
R: Priorities for Tuberculosis Bacteriology Services in Low-Income Countries.
Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 2007.
14. World Health Organization: List of medical devices by health care facility:
specialized hospital-diagnostic. 2010, [http://hinfo.humaninfo.ro/gsdl/
15. World Health Organization: Background paper 1: a stepwise approach to
identify gaps in medical devices (availability matrix and survey
methodology), Geneva. In Medical Devices: Managing the Mismatch (An
outcome of the Priority Medical Devices Project). 2010.
16. Baltussen R, Niessen L: Priority setting of health interventions: the need
for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006, 4:14.
17. Glassman A, Chalkidou K, on behalf of the Center for Global Development
Priority Setting Institutions for Global Health Working Group: Priority-Setting
in Health Building institutions for smarter public spending. Washington: Center
for Global Development; 2012.
18. Kapiriri L, Martin DK: A strategy to improve priority setting in developing
countries. Health Care Anal 2007, 15:159-167.
19. Study Group 1 of the Global Harmonization Task Force: Definition of the
terms medical device- and in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical device.
20. WHO, UNFPA, UNAIDS & FHI: The TCu380A Intrauterine Contraceptive Device
(IUD): Specification, Prequalification and Guidelines for Procurement. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2011.
21. World Health Organization: Procuring Single-Use Injection Equipment and
Safety Boxes: A practical Guide for Pharmacists, Physicians, Procurement Staff
and Programme Managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
22. Ross S, Weijer C, Gafni A, Ducey A, Thompson C, Lafreniere R: Ethics,
economics and the regulation and adoption of new medical devices:
case studies in pelvic floor surgery. BMC Med Ethics 2010, 11:14.
23. Anderson BO, Cazap E, El Saghir NS, Yip CH, Khaled HM, Otero IV,
Adebamovo C, Badwe R, Harford JB: Optimisation of breast cancer
management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive
summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus 2010. Lancet
Oncol 2011, 12:387-398.
24. Porto JP, Mantese OC, Arantes A, Freitas C, Pinto P, Filho G: Nosocomial
infections in a pediatric intensive care unit of a developing country:
NHSN surveillance. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012, 45:475-479.
25. Kalifa G, Bouras A, Reymond-Yeni A, Gendrel D: Imaging in pediatrics.
Strategy and economic implications for the Third World. Annales de
Pediatrie 1992, 39(2):67-70 [French].
26. Malkin R, Anand V: A novel phototherapy device . IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag
27. World Health Organization: Medical Device Regulations: Global Overview and
Guiding Principles. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
28. Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Voils CI: Using qualitative metasummary to
synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Res Nurs Heal
29. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at University of York: Systematic
Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York, UK:
CRD University of York; 2008.
30. PRISMA 2009 Checklist. PRISMA 2009 Checklist [http://www.prismastatement.
31. Guindo LA, Wagner M, Baltussen R, Rindress D, Van Til J, Kind P,
Goetghebeur M: From efficacy to equity: literature review of decision
criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decision making. Cost Eff
Resour Alloc 2012, 10:9.||