| dc.identifier.citation | Wolters, M., Campbell, P., DePlacido, C., Liddell, A. & Owens, D. (2007) The effect of hearing loss on the intelligibility of synthetic speech, Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the ICPhS, , , pp. 673-676, | |
| dc.description.referencetext | [1] M. A. Aylett, C. J. Pidcock, and M. E. Fraser.
The cerevoice blizzard entry 2006: A prototype
database unit selection engine. In Proceedings
of Blizzard Challenge Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA,
2006.
[2] T. Bickmore and T. Giorgino. Health dialog systems
for patients and consumers. J. Biomed. Inform.,
39(5):556-571, 1006.
[3] British Society of Audiology. Pure tone air and
bone conduction threshold audiometry with and
without masking and determination of uncomfortable
loudness levels, 2004.
[4] J. R. Dubno and H. Levitt. Predicting Consonant
Confusions from Acoustic Analysis. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 69:249-261, 1981.
[5] S. Duffy and D. Pisoni. Comprehension of synthetic
speech produced by rule: A review and
iheoretical interpretation. Language and Speech,
35:351-389, 1992.
[6] L. E. Humes. Factors underlying the speechrecognition
performance of elderly hearing-aid
wearers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
112:1112-1132, 2002.
[7] L. E. Humes, K. J. Nelson, and D. B. Pisoni.
Recognition of synthetic speech by hearingimpaired
elderly listeners. Journal of Speech and
Hearing Research, 34:1180-1184, 1991.
[8] B. Langner and A. W. Black. Using Speech In
Noise to Improve Understandability for Elderly
Listeners. In Proceedings of ASRU, San Juan,
Puerto Rico, 2005.
[9] F. S. Lee, L. J. Matthews, J. R. Dubno, and J. H.
Mills. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds
in older persons. Ear Hear, 26:1-11, 2005.
[10] P. Luce, T. Feustel, and D. Pisoni. Capacity demands
in short-term memory for synthetic and nautral
speech. Human Factors, 25:17-32, 1983.
[11] O. D.Murnane and J. K. Kelly. The effects of highfrequency
hearing loss on low-frequency components
of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission. J
Am Acad Audiol, 14:525-33, 2003.
[12] C. R. Paris, M. H. Thomas, R. D. Gilson, and J. P.
Kincaid. Linguistic cues and memory for synthetic
and natural speech. Human Factors, 42:421-431,
2000.
[13] M. Perry, A. Dowdall, L. Lines, and K. Hone.
Multimodal and ubiquitous computing systems:
Supporting independent-living older users. IEEE
Transactions on Information Technology in
Biomedicine, 8:258-270, 2004.
[14] M. K. Pichora-Fuller, B. A. Schneider, and
M. Daneman. How young and old adults listen to
and remember speech in noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am.,
97:593-608, 1995.
[15] J. Pineau,M.Montemerlo,M. Pollack, N. Roy, and
S. Thrun. Towards robotic assistants in nursing
homes: challenges and results. Robotics and Autonomous
Systems, 42:271-281, 2003.
[16] R. W. Roring, F. G. Hines, and N. Charness.
Age differences in identifying words in synthetic
speech. Hum Factors, 49:25-31, 2007.
[17] T. A. Salthouse, R. L. Babcock, and R. J. Shaw.
Effects of adult age on structural and operational
capacities in working memory. Psychol.Aging,
6:118-127, 1991.
[18] G. Sonntag, T. Portele, and F. Haas. Comparing the
comprehensibility of different synthetic voices in a
dual task experiment. In Proc. Third ESCA Workshop
on Speech Synthesis, Jenolan Caves, pages 5-
10, 1998.
[19] N. Unsworth and R. Engle. Simple and complex
memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities:
Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory
and Language, 54:68-80, 2006.
[20] J. F. Willott. Ageing and the Auditory System. Singular,
San Diego, CA, 1991.
[21] M. Wolters, P. Campbell, C. dePlacido, A. Liddell,
and D. Owens. Making synthetic speech more intelligible
for older people. submitted. | |
