Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWitter, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorGovender, Veloshnee
dc.contributor.authorRavindran, T. K. Sundari
dc.contributor.authorYates, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T22:01:51Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T22:01:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-25
dc.identifierER4782
dc.identifier.citationWitter, S., Govender, V., Ravindran, T. & Yates, R. (2017) Minding the gaps: health financing, universal health coverage and gender, Health Policy and Planning, vol. 32, , pp. v4-v12,
dc.identifier.issn0268-1080
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx063
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/4782
dc.description.abstractIn a webinar in 2015 on health financing and gender, the question was raised why we need to focus on gender, given that a well-functioning system moving towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) will automatically be equitable and gender balanced. This article provides a reflection on this question from a panel of health financing and gender experts. We trace the evidence of how health-financing reforms have impacted gender and health access through a general literature review and a more detailed case-study of India. We find that unless explicit attention is paid to gender and its intersectionality with other social stratifications, through explicit protection and careful linking of benefits to needs of target populations (e.g. poor women, unemployed men, femaleheaded households), movement towards UHC can fail to achieve gender balance or improve equity, and may even exacerbate gender inequity. Political trade-offs are made on the road to UHC and the needs of less powerful groups, which can include women and children, are not necessarily given priority. We identify the need for closer collaboration between health economists and gender experts, and highlight a number of research gaps in this field which should be addressed. While some aspects of cost sharing and some analysis of expenditure on maternal and child health have been analysed from a gender perspective, there is a much richer set of research questions to be explored to guide policy making. Given the political nature of UHC decisions, political economy as well as technical research should be prioritized. We conclude that countries should adopt an equitable approach towards achieving UHC and, therefore, prioritize high-need groups and those requiring additional financial protection, in particular women and children. This constitutes the 'progressive universalism' advocated for by the 2013 Lancet Commission on Investing in Health.
dc.format.extentv4-v12
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Policy and Planning
dc.subjectHealth Financing
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectUniversal Health Coverage
dc.subjectIndia
dc.titleMinding the gaps: health financing, universal health coverage and gender
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultysch_iih
dc.description.volume32
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1093/heapol/czx063
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid4782
rioxxterms.typearticle
refterms.dateAccepted2017-05-03
refterms.dateFCA2017-09-27
refterms.dateFCD2017-08-22
qmu.authorWitter, Sophie
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.numbersuppl_


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record