Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, Jane
dc.contributor.authorO'May, Fiona
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:30:21Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:30:21Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifierER497
dc.identifier.citationTurnbull, J. & O''May, F. (2002) GPs' and clients' views of art therapy in an Edinburgh practice., Inscape, vol. 7, , pp. 26-29,
dc.identifier.issn0264-7141
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/497
dc.description.abstractArt therapy, as a relative newcomer to the family of therapies, has not yet produced a large body of academic literature, particularly in the important areas of evaluation and outcome studies. A previous evaluation of art therapy in primary care carried out by Sowton (1997) included evaluation of patient / professional acceptability, and compliance. However, there was a high drop-out rate and effectiveness of therapy could not be gauged; reasons for referral varied widely, e.g. personality disorders, suicidal tendencies and alcohol abuse, as well as anxiety and depression. For those who stayed in therapy, acceptability was high.
dc.format.extent26-29
dc.publisherBritish Association of Art Therapists
dc.relation.ispartofInscape
dc.titleGPs' and clients' views of art therapy in an Edinburgh practice.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
dc.description.facultydiv_PaS
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid497
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorO'May, Fiona
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record