|dc.description.abstract||Aims. The aim of this paper is to share our experiences of dealing with chaos and complexity in interview situations in the home with children and young people. We highlight dilemmas relevant to dealing with multiple interruptions, building a rapport, consent and confidentiality. Furthermore, we discuss issues regarding the locus of power and control and offer some solutions based on our experiences.
Background. Creating a safe environment is essential for qualitative research. Participants are more likely to open up and communicate if they feel safe, comfortable and relaxed. We conclude that interviewing parents and their children with cystic fibrosis in their own homes, is chaotic and appears to threaten the rigour of data collection processes. Limited attention or print space is paid to this issue, with published articles frequently sanitising the messiness of real world qualitative research.
Design. Position paper.
Methods. In this position paper, we use two case studies to illustrate ethical and pragmatic challenges of interviewing out in the field. These case studies, typical of families we encountered, help emphasise the concerns we had in balancing researcher-participant rapport with the quality of the research process.
Conclusions. Dealing with perceived chaos is hard in reality, but capturing it is part of the complexity of qualitative enquiry. The context is interdependent with children's perceived reality, because they communicate with others through their environment.
Relevance to practice. This paper gives researchers an insight into the tensions of operating out in the field and helps raise the importance of the environmental 'chaos' in revealing significant issues relevant to peoples daily lives. Knowing that unexpected chaos is part and parcel of qualitative research, will equip researchers with skills fundamental for balancing the well being of all those involved with the quality of the research process.||
|dc.description.referencetext||Astedt-Kurki P, Paavilainen E & Lehti K (2001) Methodological
issues in interviewing families in family nursing research. Journal
of Advanced Nursing 35, 288-293.
Charmaz K (1995) Between positivism and post modernism:
implications for methods. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 17,
Clarke A (2006) Qualitative interviewing: encountering ethical issues
and challenges. Nurse Researcher 13, 19-28.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S & Liamputtong P (2006)
Blurring boundaries in Qualitative Health Research on sensitive
topics. Qualitative Health Research 16, 853-871.
Docherty S & SandelowskiM(1999) Interviewing children. Research
in Nursing and Health 22, 177-185.
Gallagher M (2005) Top Tips for Research and Consultation With
Children and Young People. CRFR, Edinburgh. Available at:
http://www.crfr.ac.uk/cpd/listeningtochildren/ (accessed 16 August
Gilmartin J (2002) Research notes. Nursing Standard 16, 23.
Glesne C & Peshkin A (1992) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An
Introduction. Longmans, New York.
Gregory D, Russell CK & Phillips LR (1997) Beyond textual perfection;
transcribers as vulnerable persons. Qualitative Health
Research 7, 294-300.
Harden J, Scott S, Backett-Milburn K & Jackson S (2000) Can't talk
won't talk? Methodological issues in researching Children. Sociological
Research. Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/2/
harden.html (accessed 14 September 2007).
Hill M, Laybourne A & Borland M (1996) Engaging with primary
aged children about their emotions and well-being: methodological
considerations. Children and Society 10, 129-144.
Irwin LG & Johnson J (2005) Interviewing young children: explicating
our practices and dilemmas. Qualitative Health Research
Johnson M, Long T & White A (2001) Arguments for 'British Pluralism'
in qualitative health research. Journal of Advanced Nursing
MacDonald K & Goulbourne A (2007) An Evaluation of a Community
Youth Befriending Programme for Young People With
Cystic Fibrosis and Their Carers in Lothian. Queen Margaret
Mauthner M (1997) Methodological aspects of collecting data from
children: lessons from three research projects. Children & Society
McCosker H, Barnard A & Gerber R (2001) Undertaking sensitive
research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of
all participants. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2. Available
htm/09/07 (accessed 20 September 2007).
Morrow V & Richards M (1996) The ethics of social research with
children: an overview. Children and Society 10, 90-105.
Nunkoosing K (2005) The problems with interviews. Qualitative
Health Research 15, 698-706.
Oakley A (1981) Subject Women. Fontana, London.
Pruitt RH & Privette AB (2001) Planning strategies for the avoidance
of pitfalls in intervention research. Journal of Advanced Nursing
Punch S (2002) Research with children. The same or different from
research with adults? Childhood 9, 321-341.
Scott S, Jackson S & Backett-Milburn K (1998) Swings and roundabouts:
risk anxiety and the everyday worlds of children. Sociology
Scottish Executive Health Department (2006) Research Governance
Framework for Health and Community Care. Available at: http://
RGFEdTwo.pdf (accessed 21 September 2007).
Warr DJ (2004) Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: reflections
on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations.
Qualitative Health Research 14, 578-587.
Wilson C & Powell M (2001) A Guide to Interviewing Children;
Essential Skills for Counsellors, Police, Lawyers and Social
Workers. Routledge, London.
Woodgate R (2001) Adopting the qualitative paradigm to understanding
children's perspectives of illness: barrier or facilitator.
Journal of Pediatric Nursing 16, 149-161.||