Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eTheses
    • Postgraduate
    • MA in Arts, Festival and Cultural Management
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eTheses
    • Postgraduate
    • MA in Arts, Festival and Cultural Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The eternal dilemma of accessibility versus sustainability in the theatre industry: A study of pay-what-you-want models' viability as a permanent principle

    View/Open
    2360.pdf (923.5Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    (2016) The eternal dilemma of accessibility versus sustainability in the theatre industry: A study of pay-what-you-want models' viability as a permanent principle, no. 60.
    Abstract
    If pay-what-you-want (PWYW) has started to generate interest in the researchers' community in the last few years for its accessibility dimension in conflict with its potential profitability, it can be noticed that this disputed policy has been overlooked at different levels: (1) PWYW suffers from a lack of field analysis since literature has mainly produced theoretical quantitative experiments about it (2) The arts sector has not been identified as an area that needed further research development regarding PWYW sustainability (3) PWYW has been rarely considered with regards to its long-run perspectives. Therefore, in order to determine if PWYW and its main variation, pay-what-you-decide (PWYD) can be considered as a viable business model, this paper examines the case of three theatres that have all implemented PWYW as a permanent policy (the Holbeck Underground Ballroom, UK; Available Light Theatre and Forum Theatre, US) under a qualitative and exploratory mixed methods approach. An overview of the PWYW theatres studied and their financial results is first provided, before the examination of the different issues that presently limit PWYW mechanisms in the theatre industry. It is finally concluded that PWYW is not at the moment financially viable in the arts sector, but that it could be if communication and perception barriers were removed and if PWYW, beyond its risky aspect, could be modelled on other innovative marketing systems, such as crowdfunding.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/7484
    Collections
    • MA in Arts, Festival and Cultural Management

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap