Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuetow, Stephen; orcid: 0000-0002-9771-248X
dc.contributor.authorGauld, Natalie
dc.identifierpubmed: 30027494
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9443-2
dc.identifierpii: 10.1007/s11017-018-9443-2
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical medicine and bioethics
dc.descriptionFrom PubMed via Jisc Publications Router.
dc.descriptionPublication status: aheadofprint
dc.description.abstractPerson-centered care offers a promising way to manage clinicians' conscientious objection to providing services they consider morally wrong. Health care centered on persons, rather than patients, recognizes clinicians and patients on the same stratum. The moral interests of clinicians, as persons, thus warrant as much consideration as those of other persons, including patients. Interconnected moral interests of clinicians, patients, and society construct the clinician as a socially embedded and integrated self, transcending the simplistic duality of private conscience versus public role expectations. In this milieu of blurred boundaries, person-centered care offers a constructive way to accommodate conscientious objection by clinicians. The constitutionally social nature of clinicians commits and enables them, through care mechanisms such as self-care, to optimize the quality of health care and protect the welfare of patients. To advance these conditions, it is recommended that the medical profession develop a person-centered culture of care, along with clinician virtues and skills for person-centered communication.
dc.sourceeissn: 1573-0980
dc.subjectPerson-centered care
dc.subjectRefusal to treat
dc.titleConscientious objection and person-centered care.

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record