Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValentine, Tim
dc.contributor.authorDarling, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorMemon, Amina
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:30:33Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:30:33Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifierER917
dc.identifier.citationValentine, T., Darling, S. & Memon, A. (2007) How can psychological science enhance the effectiveness of identification procedures? An international comparison., Public Interest Law Reporter, vol. 11, , pp. 21-39,
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/917
dc.description.abstractThe reliability of eyewitness identification has attracted concern from the legal profession in England for at least 100 years. In 1904 a committee of enquiry was established to investigate the trials of Adolf Beck. Incredibly, on two separate occasions Adolf Beck was wrongly convicted on the basis of mistaken eyewitness identification. In both trials, multiple eyewitnesses identified Beck as a confidence trickster who stole jewellery from them. The crimes were subsequently found to have been committed by William Wyatt. The 1904 Committee of enquiry led directly to the establishment of a Court of Appeal.2
dc.format.extent21-39
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Interest Law Reporter
dc.titleHow can psychological science enhance the effectiveness of identification procedures? An international comparison.
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dc.description.facultydiv_PaS
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.eprintid917
rioxxterms.typearticle
qmu.authorDarling, Stephen
dc.description.statuspub


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record