Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Psychology, Sociology and Education
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Psychology, Sociology and Education
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Rotten apple or rotten barrel? Social identity and children's responses to bullying

    Date
    2010-12-23
    Author
    Jones, Sian
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    York, Lucy
    Ryan, Michelle K.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Jones, S., Haslam, S. A., York, L. & Ryan, M. K. (2008) Rotten apple or rotten barrel? Social identity and children's responses to bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26 (1), pp. 117-132.
    Abstract
    Recent research has suggested that bullying behaviour may be understood as a group process, where those involved act in ways predicted by social identity theory (Ojala & Nesdale, 2004). One relevant phenomenon is the black sheep effect, whereby individuals evaluate deviant members of their in‐group more negatively than that of an out‐group. To examine this process, a study was conducted (N = 60) in which 10‐ and 11‐year‐old children were randomly assigned to a high‐status, peripheral or irrelevant group. They were then read a scenario in which a member of the high‐status group bullied a person outside the group and was supported by other high‐status group members. It was found that assigned group membership affected judgements of the acceptability of the bullying behaviour and the likeability of both (a) the high‐status group and (b) the high‐status group member. Specifically, evidence of a black sheep effect meant that high‐status group members showed less liking for the high‐status group member than for the high‐status group, and believed that this member deserved greater punishment than the high‐status group as a whole. Peripheral group members differentiated between the high‐status group member and the high‐status group in terms of liking but not punishment, while members of the irrelevant group did not make a distinction on either measure. Implications for the conceptualization of bullying are discussed.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9186
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X200385
    Collections
    • Psychology, Sociology and Education

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap