Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Media, Communication and Production
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Media, Communication and Production
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Historicizing the media effects debate

    Date
    2014-09-15
    Author
    Cronin, Theresa
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Cronin, T. (2014) Historicizing the media effects debate. In: Conboy, M. & Steel, J. (eds.) The Routledge companion to British media history. London: Routledge, pp. 85-99.
    Abstract
    Looking back over the last two centuries it would seem that debates over media effects are inextricable from the rise of mass media. As far back as the 1850s lurid popular fictions, sensationalized newspaper coverage and blood-soaked, spectacular and thrilling entertainments had all found purchase within a growing urban culture. Social commentators of the era saw these ever more sensational popular entertainments as a clear symptom of social and moral decline and argued that such depictions were likely to incite further instances of immorality and crime (Murdock, 2001). However, it was the arrival of cinema that prompted the development of media effects research as we know it today. So while in the early days of cinema public fears circulated around the potential for the darkness of the movie theatre itself to lead to crime and immoral behavior (Currie, 1907; Fosdick, 1911; Kuhn, 1988; Butsch, 2002), and the very real danger presented by the highly inflammable film stock (Kuhn, 1988; Czitrom, 1992; Merritt, 1976; Vorspan, 2000), these soon gave way to a perception that the films themselves might be “injurious to public morality … to encourage or incite to crime, or … lead to disorder” (Kuhn, 1988: 20). Indeed many writers at the time claimed that moviegoers were likely to imitate the crimes they witnessed on screen (Butsch, 2002). For example, Hugo Münsterberg, a professor at Harvard, argued that the intensity with which the plays take hold of the audience cannot remain without social effects … it is evident that such a penetrating influence must be fraught with dangers. The more vividly the impressions force themselves on the mind the more easily they must become starting points for imitation and other motor responses.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9806
    Official URL
    http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315756202
    Collections
    • Media, Communication and Production

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap