Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenseThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
dc.contributor.authorWitter, Sophieen
dc.contributor.authorChirwa, Yotamuen
dc.contributor.authorChandiwana, Pamelaen
dc.contributor.authorMunyati, Shunguen
dc.contributor.authorPepukai, Mildreden
dc.contributor.authorBertone, Maria Paolaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T09:21:35Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T09:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-15
dc.identifier.citationWitter, S., Chirwa, Y., Chandiwana, P., Munyati, S., Pepukai, M. & Bertone, M. P. (2019) The political economy of results-based financing: The experience of the health system in Zimbabwe. Global Health Research and Policy, 4 (20).en
dc.identifier.issn2397-0642en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9862
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0111-5
dc.descriptionSophie Witter - orcid: 0000-0002-7656-6188 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-6188en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since 2000, results based financing (RBF) has proliferated in health sectors in Africa in particular, including in fragile and conflict affected settings (FCAS) and there is a growing but still contested literature about its relevance and effectiveness. Less examined are the political economy factors behind the adoption of the RBF policy, as well as the shifts in influence and resources which RBF may bring about. In this article, we examine these two topics, focusing on Zimbabwe, which has rolled out RBF nationwide in the health system since 2011, with external support.en
dc.description.abstractMethods: The study uses an adapted political economy framework, integrating data from 40 semi-structured interviews with local, national and international experts in 2018 and thematic analysis of 60 policy documents covering the decade between 2008 and 2018.
dc.description.abstractResults: Our findings highlight the role of donors in initiating the RBF policy, but also how the Zimbabwe health system was able to adapt the model to suit its particular circumstances – seeking to maintain a systemic approach, and avoiding fragmentation. Although Zimbabwe was highly resource dependent after the political-economic crisis of the 2000s, it retained managerial and professional capacity, which distinguishes it from many other FCAS settings. This active adaptation has engendered national ownership over time, despite initial resistance to the RBF model and despite the complexity of RBF, which creates dependence on external technical support. Adoption was also aided by ideological retro-fitting into an earlier government performance management policy. The main beneficiaries of RBF were frontline providers, who gained small but critical additional resources, but subject to high degrees of control and sanctions.
dc.description.abstractConclusions: This study highlights resource-seeking motivations for adopting RBF in some low and middle income settings, especially fragile ones, but also the potential for local health system actors to shape and adapt RBF to suit their needs in some circumstances. This means less structural disruption in the health system and it increases the likelihood of an integrated approach and sustainability. We highlight the mix of autonomy and control which RBF can bring for frontline providers and argue for clearer understanding of the role that RBF commonly plays in these settings.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded by the Department for International Development, UK Aid, under the ReBUILD grant. However, the funders take no responsibility for the views expressed in this article.en
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0111-5en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Health Research and Policyen
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2019
dc.subjectPolitical Economy Analysisen
dc.subjectResults-based Financingen
dc.subjectZimbabween
dc.subjectHealth Financing Reformsen
dc.subjectFragile And Crisis-affected Settingsen
dc.titleThe political economy of results-based financing: The experience of the health system in Zimbabween
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-24
dc.description.volume4en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2019-07-15
refterms.dateFCD2019-07-18
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOAen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
qmu.authorWitter, Sophieen
qmu.authorBertone, Maria Paolaen
qmu.centreInstitute for Global Health and Developmenten
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.number20en
refterms.versionVoRen
refterms.dateDeposit2019-07-18


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record