Arthur, RosieCallow, NicholaRoberts, RossGlendinning, Freya2022-04-282022-04-282019-02-01Arthur, R., Callow, N., Roberts, R. and Glendinning, F. (2019) 'Coaches coaching psychological skills—why not? A framework and questionnaire development', Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41(1), pp. 10-23.0895-27791543-2904https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2017-0198https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12144Item previously deposited in Bangor University repository at: https://research.bangor.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutputs/coaches-coaching-psychological-skills--why-not-a-framework-and-questionnaire-development(2e6a0ac3-abf7-4348-a405-b287e372524f).htmlItem not available in this repository.Rosie Arthur - ORCID: 0000-0003-0651-4056 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-4056This study is part of a program of research investigating coaches delivering psychological skills (PS). Here, 3 studies feature an original conceptualization of coaching PS and the development and validation of 2 questionnaires capturing the coaching of PS. The authors conducted a qualitative investigation to establish a conceptual framework that included the fundamental coaching of PS behaviors (CPS-F) and the needs-supportive coaching of PS (CPS-NS). They then tested the factor structure of 2 subsequently developed questionnaires via a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach to confirmatory factor analysis across 2 samples and ran tests of invariance, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity. The CPS-F questionnaire showed an excellent fit for a 3-factor model, whereas the CPS-NS demonstrated an excellent single-factor fit. Significant relationships with theoretically related constructs suggested concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity. The findings are expected to significantly further research into our understanding of coaches coaching PS.10-23enAwarenessBayesianInvarianceMetacognitiveSDTValidationCoaches coaching psychological skills—why not? A framework and questionnaire developmentArticle