Browsing by Person "Beveridge, Joanna"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item A mapping review of models of practice education in allied health and social care professions(SAGE, 2020-03-03) Beveridge, Joanna; Pentland, DuncanPractice education is fundamental to pre-registration learning for many health and social care professions, yet finding sufficient opportunities for students is challenging. One-to-one student-educator pairings are common, and while different models could increase placement opportunities, associated terminology is inconsistent and an overview of advantages, challenges and available evidence is missing. This mapping review identifies, categorises, and critically considers the evidence for different models of practice education used by health and social care professions. Papers from 2008 onwards reporting on practice education approaches in allied health or social care profession courses were identified in three databases. Data was extracted, methodological quality categorised and a typology of practice education models developed. 53 papers were reviewed and developed into a typology of fourteen models. Mapping indicated issues with a lack of high quality research and limitations in available outcome indicators. Pre-requisites for the effective operation of different models include preparation, communication, and allowing sufficient time for new ways of working. Practice education discourse is characterised by varied terminology and practices. Various models for structuring practice education exist though the evidence for their effectiveness and impact on capacity is limited. Using consistent language and considering wider impacts and outcomes is recommended in future study.Item Practice education in the UK: A comparative cross-sectional investigation of key stakeholders’ perspectives(SAGE, 2019-08-01) Beveridge, Joanna; Pentland, DuncanPractice education is a core requirement of occupational therapy education that is key to the development of the profession’s future. Changing educational and financial landscapes across the UK causes challenges to the provision of sufficient high quality placements. Providing placements requires input from multiple stakeholders from different, and at times diverging, contexts. This research was completed to generate up-to-date information about how key stakeholders view different roles and responsibilities, consider the value of accreditation programs in supporting educators, and what changes could be made to the way practice education is developed and supported. The study used cross-sectional and action-oriented learning methods to generate qualitative data about the perspectives of participants. Online surveys and telephone interviews were completed by three different populations (professional practice tutors, those who provide or support the provision of practice education experiences, and current pre-registration occupational therapy students). Workshops based on soft systems methodology (Checkland and Poulter 2006) were completed with mixed participant groups. A thematic analysis approach outlined by Nowell et al (2017) was completed, followed by a comparative analysis to highlight both shared and divergent perspectives among participants. Key descriptive and thematic results will be presented, along with the results of the comparative analysis. The results of this research can be used by those involved in providing practice education at local, regional and national levels to help understand the perceptions of stakeholder groups and engage with these in an informed way to help develop high quality practice education experiences. Ethical Approval provided by Queen Margaret University’s Research Ethics Panel (RCOT_PE_REVIEW_190918_V. 1).