Repository logo

Browsing by Person "Patterson, Joanne"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and feasibility of a Swallowing intervention Package (SiP) for patients receiving radiotherapy treatment for head and neck cancer—the SiP study protocol
    (BMC, 2016-08-04) Wells, Mary; King, Emma; Toft, Kate; MacAulay, Fiona; Patterson, Joanne; Dougall, Nadine; Hulbert-Williams, Nick; Boa, Sally; Slaven, Eleanor; Cowie, Julie; McGarva, John; Niblock, Patricia Gail; Philp, Julie; Roe, Justin
    Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, and the functional, psychological and social consequences of HNC cancer and its treatment can be severe and chronic. Dysphagia (swallowing problems) affects up to two thirds of patients undergoing combined chemoradiotherapy. Recent reviews suggest that prophylactic swallowing exercises may improve a range of short- and long-term outcomes; however, the importance of psychological and behavioural factors on adherence to swallowing exercises has not been adequately studied. This study aims to develop and test the feasibility of a Swallowing intervention Package (SiP) designed in partnership with patients, speech and language therapists (SLTs) and other members of the head and neck multi-disciplinary team (MDT), for patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. Methods/design: This feasibility study uses quantitative and qualitative research methods, within a quasi-experimental design, to assess whether patients will tolerate and adhere to the SiP intervention, which aspects of the intervention can be implemented and which cannot, whether treatment fidelity can be achieved across different contexts, whether study processes and outcome measures will be feasible and acceptable and to what extent the intervention is likely to have an impact on swallowing dysfunction and quality of life. Patients are being recruited from five sites in Scotland and England (three interventions and two usual care). The SLT based in the relevant intervention centre teaches the exercise programme and provides supporting materials. A combination of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), adherence measures and clinical swallowing assessments are used prior to intervention (baseline), at the end of treatment, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Discussion: This collaborative study has taken a unique approach to the development of a patient-centred and evidence-based swallowing intervention. The introduction of an e-SiP app provides an exploration of the use of technology in delivering this intervention. The study provides an opportunity to examine the feasibility of delivering and participating in a supported swallowing intervention across several different NHS sites and will provide the evidence needed to refine intervention and study processes for a future trial. Trial registration: NCRI portfolio, 18192 & 20259
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Feasibility and outcomes of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing following prophylactic swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer
    (Wiley, 2019-03-20) Patterson, Joanne; Toft, Kate; McAuley, Fiona; King, Emma; McLachlan, Kirsty; Roe, Justin W. G.; Wells, Mary
    Objectives: Investigate the feasibility and outcomes of fibreoptic endoscopic evalua‐tion of swallowing (FEES) following a programme of prophylactic swallowing exer‐cises in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy.Design: Prospective, single cohort, feasibility study.Setting: Three head and neck cancer centres in Scotland.Participants: Pre‐radiotherapy HNC patients who consented to participate in a pro‐phylactic swallowing intervention.Outcome measures: Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing recruitment and retention rates, assessment acceptability and compliance, qualitative process evaluation.Results: Higher rates of recruitment and retention were achieved in centres where FEES equipment was available on‐site. Travel and anticipated discomfort were barri‐ers to recruitment. Data completion was high for all rating scales, with good reliabil‐ity. Following radiotherapy, swallowing safety significantly deteriorated for liquid boluses (P = 0.005‐0.03); pharyngeal residue increased for liquid and semi‐solid bo‐luses. Pharyngo‐laryngeal oedema was present pre‐treatment and significantly in‐creased post‐radiotherapy (P = 0.001). Patients generally reported positive experience of FEES for their own learning and establishing a baseline.Conclusions: Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing is an acceptable method of assessing patients for a prophylactic swallowing intervention and offers some ad‐ditional information missing from VF. Barriers have been identified and should be taken into account in order to maximise recruitment for future trials.