LEAD - Learning Enhancement and Academic Development
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/14083
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Relational work and identity negotiation in critical post observation teacher feedback(Elsevier, 2018-08-15) Donaghue, HelenThis article responds to the call for more empirical research to further our understanding of how identities are produced and performed in discourse. Data extracts from dyadic post observation feedback meetings between an experienced teacher and two supervisors are analysed. Analysis focuses on the relational work participants do to achieve identities in interaction. Analysis reveals delicate and complex negotiation processes as participants claim, ascribe, challenge, and relinquish local identities. Analysis shows that identities are emergent, relational and co-constructed, and that (im)politeness is an interactional resource used to construct identities. This article extends previous research by comparing interactants' relational work. Analysis of data extracts from two different meetings in which a supervisor points out the same teaching problem (poor instructions) with the same teacher enables a comparison of how identities are achieved. One supervisor uses politeness strategies while the other adopts aggressive and critical behaviour to claim and ascribe the same identities. In both instances the teacher resists but then co-constructs his negative ascribed identity. Within a linguistic ethnographic framework, micro analysis of feedback talk is supplemented with ethnographic interview data to enable a contextualised examination. Ethnographic data reveal the influence of institutional goals on local identity construction and relational work.Item ‘Time to construct positive identities’: display questions in post observation teacher feedback(Routledge, 2019-03-14) Donaghue, HelenThis article focuses on the use of display questions to construct positive identities in post observation feedback talk between in-service English language teachers and a supervisor. Using a linguistic ethnographic framework, microanalysis of dyadic feedback interaction is supplemented with ethnographic data gathered from participant perspective interviews and researcher knowledge of the research site and participants. Results show that display questions give feedback participants the opportunity to voice their knowledge and expertise thereby enabling them to claim positive identities. Display questions are also used by the supervisor to claim a practising teacher identity in order to reassure teachers of his worth as an observer and leader. Display questions help the supervisor perform a manager identity as they allow him to control the topic and evaluate teachers. While some teachers verify this identity by complying and providing the required answer, one teacher resists, replying reluctantly and with irritation, thereby contesting the supervisor’s manager identity. This shows that identities are fluid, contestable, and discursively accomplished in situated feedback talk. Two practical implications are discussed: (1) the need for further research into feedback with in-service teachers (2) the suggestion that supervisors examine extracts from feedback to help them become more reflective and critical practitioners.