Repository logo
 

Approaches to APEL in France and the UK: Holism versus Empiricism?

dc.contributor.authorPouget, Mireille
dc.contributor.authorOberski, Iddo
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T15:45:26Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T15:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractThe APEL (Accreditation/Assessment of Prior Experiential Learning) systems in the UK and France are probably the best developed in Europe, but they are underpinned by different conceptions of learning and experience. In this article, we attempt to understand the two different approaches to APEL within the framework of Goethe's 'natural phenomenology', which essentially attempts to understand phenomena in their own right, without analysing them into parts. An initial analysis would suggest that in the UK the APEL process reflects a conception of experience and learning as being built up of a number of smaller units. In France, on the other hand, the process involves instead a more holistic approach to the evaluation and understanding of experience and learning
dc.description.eprintid578
dc.description.facultyCAP
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number1
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.volume7
dc.format.extent05-Dec
dc.identifierER578
dc.identifier.citationPouget, M. & Oberski, I. (2005) Approaches to APEL in France and the UK: Holism versus Empiricism?, Widening Participation & Lifelong Learning, vol. 7, , pp. 05-Dec,
dc.identifier.issn1466-6529
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/578
dc.publisherStaffordshire University
dc.relation.ispartofWidening Participation & Lifelong Learning
dc.titleApproaches to APEL in France and the UK: Holism versus Empiricism?
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsnone
qmu.authorOberski, Iddo
rioxxterms.typearticle

Files