RHIZOMATIC TRANSPOSITIONS: INCLUDING CREATIVE PRACTICE WITHIN WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY

Abstract

Western ontology has traditionally viewed rivers as objects for the intentional purposes of human society. Water policy ensures that rivers are maintained to distribute water and protect against flooding. However, with climate change, the health of many rivers is decreasing, while risk of flooding from rivers is increasing. Water policies appear to be unable to change such negative trends, which are inter-related with poor and exploitative human/river relationships. To form a different relationship between humankind and rivers, this creative practice research develops creative practice based on nomadic ontology and psychosocial perspectives. The research develops a methodology that aims to transform the human/river relationship. Practice-led approaches are employed as an exploration of the artist’s creative practice, including 1) physical immersion in water, 2) underwater film, and 3) aerial photographic collage. Using personal reflective methods that critically analysed the artist’s affective experience, a transformative approach was developed, called the ‘Site of possibility’, which created a site of affective engagement between human and rivers that was different from daily habitual routine. Participatory methods included walking, poetry, mark-making and a creative interpretation of the dialogic method known as the ‘visual matrix’. Emerging differences in perception became Deleuzian ‘deterritorialization’, a shift of mind and heart through creative participatory practice. People’s habitual views of rivers became reterritorialized so that human/river relationships were transformed into a new awareness of human positionality in relation to rivers and, potentially, in relation to policy design directed at water. In three case studies, the Site of possibility creative approach proved successful in transforming people’s perceptions and positions in relationship in relationship to rivers in ways that could potentially inform water policy, creating a more bioegalitarian relationship between rivers and people. These findings show that creative practice approaches have potential to inform water policy and provide direction and guidance for systemic change to problems of governance for rivers.