Repository logo
 

Religiousness and Quality of Life Among Older Adults of Different Ethnic Groups in Malaysia: A Five-Year Follow-up Study

dc.contributor.authorTan, Min Minen
dc.contributor.authorReidpath, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorTing, Rachel Sing-Kiaten
dc.contributor.authorAllotey, Pascaleen
dc.contributor.authorSu, Tin Tinen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T13:31:55Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T13:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-29
dc.descriptionItem not available in this repository.en
dc.description.abstractResearch has shown that religion is associated with a better quality of life (QoL). This study aims to examine ethnic differences in the association between religion and the QoL of older adults in a predominantly Muslim population within a multicultural setting. Two-wave data of 3,810 participants consisting of mostly Muslims and older adults aged ≥ 55 years were collected as part of the community health surveys conducted in 2013 and 2018 in the South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO). Both cross-sectional analyses of baseline data and prospective analyses of longitudinal data were conducted. The associations between religiosity and quality of life were mainly positive in the cross-sectional analysis. In the two-wave analysis, religious importance was negatively associated with QoL among the Malays (B = − 1.103, SE B = 0.029, p < .001) and the Chinese (B = − 0.160, SE B = 0.043, p < .001), and a belief in a higher power control was associated with better QoL among the Malays (B = 0.051, SE B = 0.022, p < .005) and poorer QoL domains among the Indians (physical health: B = − 5.412, SE B = 1.382, p < .001; psychological: B = − 3.325, SE B = 1.42, p < .001; social relationship: B = − 5.548, SE B = 1.616, p < .001; environment: B = − 2.586, SE B = 1.288; p < .05). Our study's mixed results suggest that religiosity is positively associated with quality of life in cross-sectional analyses. However, in longitudinal analyses, the results are different. Conclusions with regard to causality based on cross-sectional analyses may be misleading. Health promotion programs should continue to examine the effect of religiousness on health outcomes over time among aging populations across different ethnic groups.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number2en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01371-xen
dc.description.volume61en
dc.format.extent1548–1563en
dc.identifier.citationTan, M.M., Reidpath, D.D., Ting, R.S.-K., Allotey, P. and Su, T.T. (2022) ‘Religiousness and quality of life among older adults of different ethnic groups in Malaysia: a five-year follow-up study’, Journal of Religion and Health, 61(2), pp. 1548–1563. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01371-x.en
dc.identifier.issn0022-4197en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12794
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01371-x
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Religion and Healthen
dc.titleReligiousness and Quality of Life Among Older Adults of Different Ethnic Groups in Malaysia: A Five-Year Follow-up Studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-07-23
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.typeBooken

Files