Repository logo
 

Some stuttering treatments are 'possibly effective' for some people, but more rigorous trials are required

dc.contributor.authorLickley, Robin
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T15:53:24Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T15:53:24Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses a study designed to determine how effective are behavioural, cognitive, and related approaches to stuttering therapy. The study was designed as a systematic review with trial-quality assessment. Included studies involved treatment of persistent developmental stuttering in any age group. Studies included had to focus on the efficacy, effectiveness, or outcomes of nonpharmacological interventions.
dc.description.eprintid415
dc.description.facultycasl
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number4
dc.description.referencetextChambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18. Franken, M. J., Kielstra-Van der Schalk, C. J., & Boelens, H. (2005). Experimental Treatment of early stuttering: A preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 189-199. Herder, C., Howard, C., Nye, C., & Vanryckenghem (2006). Effectiveness of behavioral stuttering treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 33, 61-73. Jones, M., Onslow, M., Packman, A., Williams, S., Ormond, T., Williams, S., Ormond, T. Schwarz, I., & Gebski, V. (2005). Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention. British Medical Journal, 331, 659-661. Martin, R. R., Haroldson, S. K., & Triden, K. A. (1984). Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 53-58. Law, J. (2007). Behavioral stuttering treatments are effective, but no one treatment is more effective over other treatment approaches. [Abstract]. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 14-15. Abstract of Herder, C., Howard, C., Nye, C., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2006). Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 33, 61-73. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2006). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Retrieved September 10, 2007, from http://www.cebm.net/index.asp
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.volume1
dc.format.extent156-158
dc.identifierER415
dc.identifier.citationLickley, R.J. (2007) ‘Some stuttering treatments are “possibly effective” for some people, but more rigorous trials are required1’, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1(4), pp. 156–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530701852303.
dc.identifier.doihttp://10.1080/17489530701852303
dc.identifier.issn1748-9547 (electronic) 1748-9539 (paper)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17489530701852303
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/415
dc.publisherPsychology Press
dc.relation.ispartofEvidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
dc.titleSome stuttering treatments are 'possibly effective' for some people, but more rigorous trials are required
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
qmu.authorLickley, Robin
qmu.centreCASLen
rioxxterms.typearticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
415.pdf
Size:
61.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections