Repository logo
 

Teaching as a Masters profession in England: The need for continued debate

dc.contributor.authorJackson, Alisonen
dc.contributor.authorEady, Sandraen
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T14:46:46Z
dc.date.available2019-04-15T14:46:46Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-16
dc.descriptionSandra Eady - ORCID: 0000-0002-1089-666X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-666Xen
dc.descriptionDeposited in University of Stirling (STORRE) repository on 31 August 2016 under permanent embargo, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/3129
dc.descriptionItem not available in this repository
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we suggest that teacher educators in higher education institutions (HEIs) in England are not fully convinced that teaching should be a Masters. Through the ongoing debate with teacher educators concerning ‘teaching as a Masters profession’, it was discovered that it remains difficult for teacher educators to propose a definition of ‘Mastersness’ that satisfies them on a personal or political level.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number1en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.volume38en
dc.format.extent149-152en
dc.identifier.citationJackson, A. & Eady, S. (2012) Teaching as a Masters profession in England: The need for continued debate. Professional Development in Education, 38 (1), pp. 149-152.en
dc.identifier.issn1941-5265en
dc.identifier.issn1941-5257
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9678
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.554714
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofProfessional Development in Educationen
dc.subjectProfessional Developmenten
dc.subjectMasters Accreditationen
dc.subjectTeachersen
dc.titleTeaching as a Masters profession in England: The need for continued debateen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-01-12
qmu.authorEady, Sandraen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2011-03-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files