Review of the integrity of a Self Administered Motivational Instrument
| dc.contributor.author | Duffy, Tim | |
| dc.contributor.author | McCaig, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McGrandles, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rimmer, Russell | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martin, C. R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T20:20:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T20:20:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Motivational interviewing (MI) was developed by Miller and Rollnick as an evidence-based counselling approach for use in supporting people with alcohol problems. Over the years the principles and spirit of MI have been reviewed and fine-tuned and the approach has been embraced by practitioners worldwide and across fields. Since 2001 a number of instruments have been designed to evaluate the fidelity of MI practice. For the purposes of this study, one such instrument is used to assess a self-administered motivational instrument, known as the SAMI, which takes the interviewer role. Objectives: The SAMI is evaluated against the MITI 3.1.1, which is designed to assess the extent to which MI interventions perform on five global dimensions. These are evocation, collaboration, autonomy/support, direction and empathy. Design: The SAMI was assembled based on the principles and spirit of MI, problem solving and goal-setting. The targeted behaviour changes were student learning styles and approaches to study. Setting: The SAMI was distributed, completed and submitted electronically via the university virtual learning environment. Participants: Thirty three mature students of a university which delivered online nursing programme were invited to complete the SAMI. Of these, 25 submitted completed transcripts. Methods: Transcripts of a sample of six completed SAMIs were assessed by a group of teachers and researchers with experience in the use and evaluation of MI, using five-point Likert scales to assess the SAMI on the five dimensions. Results: Overall, an average score exceeding 4.5 was attained across the five dimensions. Conventionally, such a score is recognised as competency in MI. However, on one dimension (empathy), the rating was three. Conclusions: This current research confirms that global principles have been observed in the online delivery of MI using the SAMI to probe approaches to study. 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.description.eprintid | 3234 | |
| dc.description.faculty | div_BaM | |
| dc.description.ispublished | pub | |
| dc.description.status | pub | |
| dc.identifier | ER3234 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Duffy, T., McCaig, M., McGrandles, A., Rimmer, R. and Martin, C.R. (2014) ‘Review of the integrity of a self administered motivational instrument’, Nurse Education Today, 34(4), pp. 625–630. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.015. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.015 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0260-6917) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.015 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/3234 | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Nurse Education Today | |
| dc.title | Review of the integrity of a Self Administered Motivational Instrument | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dcterms.accessRights | restricted | |
| qmu.author | Rimmer, Russell | |
| rioxxterms.type | article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- eResearch_3234.pdf
- Size:
- 271.22 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format