Repository logo
 

Psychological factors and demands for breast and cervical cancer screening

dc.contributor.authorJiang, Taoen
dc.contributor.authorWei, Donghuaen
dc.contributor.authorSha, Ruien
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Junqingen
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaopengen
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Ruien
dc.contributor.authorShen, Xingrongen
dc.contributor.authorKadetz, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Debinen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T09:42:51Z
dc.date.available2022-07-06T09:42:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-01
dc.descriptionPaul I. Kadetz - ORCID: 0000-0002-2824-1856 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2824-1856en
dc.descriptionItem not available in this repository.
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aims to investigate relationships between demands for breast and cervical cancer screening (BCS/CCS) and related health beliefs. Methods: The study used cluster-randomized sampling and collected data about demands for BCS/CCS and constructs of health beliefs model (HBM). It calculated indices of perceived risk and seriousness of the cancers and perceived effectiveness, benefits and difficulties of the screening; and performed descriptive and multivariate regression analysis of the demands and the HBM constructs. Results: Less than 23.7% of respondents (N = 805) had ever undertaken BCS/CCS but 62.7% reported willingness to receive the service. Demands for BCS/CCS illustrated negative associations (Beta = 0.11 and 0.10) with age but positive (Beta = 0.15 and 0.11) links with education. The absolute values of standardized regression coefficients between the demand and the HBM constructs added up to 0.69 for BCS and 0.64 for CCS respectively, being 4–40 times that of age and education. Conclusions: Models incorporating all HBM constructs have substantially greater power than commonly researched single factors in explaining BCS/CCS demands. Practice implications: Comprehensive BCS/CCS promotion addressing all HBM constructs in a synergetic way may prove to be more effective.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number7en
dc.description.sponsorshipDevelopment of the primitive protocol was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 71503009). Refinement and implementation of the protocol is lead and supported by the Collaboration Center for Cancer Control of Anhui Medical University and Hefei Center for Diseases Control and Prevention.en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.014en
dc.description.volume101en
dc.format.extent1270-1275en
dc.identifier.citationJiang, T., Wei, D., Sha, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Feng, R., Sheng, X., Kadetz, P. and Wang, D. (2018) 'Psychological factors and demands for breast and cervical cancer screening', Patient Education and Counseling, 101(7), pp. 1270-1275.en
dc.identifier.issn0738-3991en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12392
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofPatient Education and Counselingen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectBreasten
dc.subjectCervicalen
dc.subjectComplianceen
dc.titlePsychological factors and demands for breast and cervical cancer screeningen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-23
qmu.authorKadetz, Paulen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2018-06-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files