Repository logo
 

Class‐3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: Comparison of spiral and figure‐of‐eight techniques

dc.contributor.authorCoull, Alisonen
dc.contributor.authorTolson, Debbieen
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, Jeanen
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T16:24:52Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T16:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2006-04-21
dc.descriptionAlison Coull – ORCID: 0000-0002-3166-0699 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-0699en
dc.descriptionItem not available in this repository.
dc.description.abstractAim. This paper reports a study to compare the differences in compression produced on a limb using a spiral and a figure‐of‐eight bandaging technique.en
dc.description.abstractBackground. Chronic leg ulcers are a major health problem in Western countries. Compression bandaging is the accepted treatment for venous leg ulcers. The spiral and the figure‐of‐eight techniques are traditional methods of applying compression bandages. but their performance in terms of pressure profiles is unknown. Despite a lack of evidence about technique, class‐3c compression bandages are not currently recommended for application in a figure‐of‐eight as this is thought to produce dangerously high pressure.
dc.description.abstractMethods. A cross‐over experimental design was used with a sample of 26 nurse bandagers. Consistency of performance was tested. Bandage stretch and overlap were measured and analysed by standard deviation to ensure that the techniques were consistent and repeatable. Pressure probes were then applied to the medial, posterior and lateral aspects of the lower limb of a healthy volunteer. The class‐3c compression bandage was applied using both techniques and the pressure profiles around the leg were measured under the bandage. The results of each technique were compared using independent sample t‐tests. The data were collected in 1999.
dc.description.abstractResults. The figure‐of‐eight technique provided statistically significantly higher compression at lower areas of the leg than the spiral technique. Mean pressure difference was 20·3 mmHg at the ankle, 22·2 mmHg at the gaiter, 9·4 mmHg at the calf. The pressure differences decrease towards the knee with both techniques and decrease more steeply with the figure‐of‐eight technique.
dc.description.abstractConclusion. The spiral technique was a safe and comfortable method of bandage application. The figure‐of‐eight also provided graduated compression but with some high areas of pressure, notably overlying the Achilles tendon. However, before firm practice recommendations are made, replication of the study using a padding layer and a larger sample is needed.
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number3en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first author would like to acknowledge the support of The Smith and Nephew Foundation for a Nursing Research Scholarship which provided some funding for the study to be undertaken in partial fulfilment of a Master of Science degree.en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03816.xen
dc.description.volume54en
dc.format.extent274-283en
dc.identifier.citationCoull, A., Tolson, D. & McIntosh, J. (2006) Class‐3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: comparison of spiral and figure‐of‐eight techniques. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), pp. 274-283.en
dc.identifier.govdochttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03816.x
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11175
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursingen
dc.subjectBandaging Techniquesen
dc.subjectClinical Performanceen
dc.subjectCross‐Over Studyen
dc.subjectNursingen
dc.subjectPressure Profilesen
dc.subjectVascular Diseaseen
dc.subjectVenous Leg Ulcersen
dc.titleClass‐3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: Comparison of spiral and figure‐of‐eight techniquesen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dcterms.dateAccepted2005-08-01
qmu.authorCoull, Alisonen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2006-04-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files

Collections